American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 795-800, November 2006

Pigtail catheters vs large-bore chest tubes for management of secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces in adults

  • Wen-Kai Tsai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Chest Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yulin 651, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Wei Chen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jen-chih Lee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Wei-Erh Cheng, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chia-Hung Chen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Wu-Huei Hsu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Chest Medicine, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yulin 651, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chuen-Ming Shih, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
    • School of Respiratory Therapy, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan. Fax: +886 4 22077618.

Received 21 March 2006; received in revised form 23 April 2006; accepted 25 April 2006.

Abstract 

It is still uncertain if large-bore chest tubes (20F-28F) is superior to pigtail catheter (10F-14F) in terms of the management of secondary spontaneous pneumothoraces (SSP).This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety associated with placement of large-bore chest tubes vs pigtail catheters in adults experiencing the first episode of SSP. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 91 patients experiencing the first episode of SSP in a university hospital over a 3.5-year period who received treatment by either a large-bore chest tube or a pigtail catheter. Any patient who was younger than 18 years or experiencing mechanical ventilation–related barotraumas or pyopneumothorax was excluded from this study. Various parameters including demographical characteristics, size of pneumothorax, complications, time of pigtail or chest tube extubation, and length of hospital stay were collected and analyzed. Among the enrolled 91 patients, including 76 (83.5%) men with a mean age of 60 ± 19 years, 69 were initially treated with a pigtail, and 22 patients received conventional chest tubes. Fifty patients (72.5%) undergoing the pigtail drainage and 16 (72.7%) undergoing large-bore chest tube treatment of SSP were successfully treated (P = .88). In addition, there was no significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay, extubation time, recurrence rate, and complication. Pigtail catheters offer a safe and effective alternative for large-bore chest tubes to adult patients experiencing the first episode of SSP, and we strongly suggested that pigtail tube drainage should be considered as the initial treatment of choice.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0735-6757(06)00142-2

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2006.04.006

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 795-800, November 2006