Reperfusion strategies in the emergency treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction☆
Received 17 May 2006; received in revised form 17 July 2006; accepted 25 July 2006.
Abstract
Prompt restoration of blood flow is the primary treatment goal in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to optimize clinical outcomes. The ED plays a critical role in rapid triage, diagnosis, and management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and in the decision about which of the 2 recommended reperfusion options, that is, pharmacologic and mechanical (catheter-based) strategies, to undertake. Guidelines recommend percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if the medical contact-to-balloon time can be kept under 90 minutes, and timely administration of fibrinolytics if greater than 90 minutes. Most US hospitals do not have PCI facilities, which means the decision becomes whether to treat with a fibrinolytic agent, transfer, or both, followed by PCI if needed. Whichever reperfusion approach is used, successful treatment depends on the ED having an integrated and efficient protocol that is followed with haste. Protocols should be regularly reviewed to accommodate changes in clinical practice arising from ongoing clinical trials.
aDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
bDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
cDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston and The Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, Houston, TX 77225, USA
dDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 216 445 4546.
☆ Source of support: preparation of this manuscript was supported by PDL BioPharma Inc.