Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 753-756, September 2007
Supine vs semirecumbent and upright 12-lead electrocardiogram: does change in body position alter the electrocardiographic interpretation for ischemia?
Abstract
Objective
The goal of this study was to determine if a change in body position alters the 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) interpretation for ischemia and ST-segment elevation, the latter having direct implications for initial patient management in the emergency department.
Methods
Twelve-lead ECGs were sequentially obtained from a convenience sample of healthy adult volunteers in 3 positions (supine, 0°; inclined, 45°; and upright, 90°). The tracings were randomized, blinded, and then independently read by 2 trained emergency medicine physicians who also assessed for the presence of ischemia and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Results
Seventy-five subjects were enrolled, with 7 (9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4-18) having ischemia on the supine ECG, 9 (12%; 95% CI, 6-22) on the incline, and 9 on the upright tracings. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction pattern was present on 2 (3%; 95% CI, 0-9) supine, 2 inclined, and 2 upright ECGs.
Conclusions
Changes in body position result in some ischemic variations of the 12-lead ECG.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented at the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Research Forum, Washington, DC, September 2005, and the New England Regional Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) meeting, Shrewsbury, MA, March 2006.
PII: S0735-6757(06)00430-X
doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.005
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 753-756, September 2007
