American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 780-785, September 2007

Impact of conducted electrical weapons in a mentally ill population: a brief report

  • Jeffrey D. Ho, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Donald M. Dawes, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Lompoc District Hospital, Lompoc, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Mark A. Johnson, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Medical and Technical Research, TASER International, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  • ,
  • Erik J. Lundin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Medical and Technical Research, TASER International, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  • ,
  • James R. Miner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Received 9 January 2007; received in revised form 10 February 2007; accepted 11 February 2007.

Abstract 

Introduction

Conducted electrical weapons (CEWs) are used by some law enforcement agencies to subdue mentally ill subjects who are combative, violent, or suicidal. The use of CEWs in this population is controversial. Proponents advocate CEW use to avoid other forms of escalated force. Opponents advocate against CEW use because of the potential for abuse. What is lacking in the medical literature is documentation of the impact on outcome that this technology may have when used in this population. This project represents an initial report in this area.

Methods

A database of CEW use has been maintained since 1999 to which law enforcement agencies voluntarily report. This database was reviewed for occurrences of CEW use on mentally ill and suicidal subjects. Situation outcome and potential for law enforcement use of deadly force as an alternative were recorded. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.

Results

There were 10608 reports of CEW use over a 72-month period. Of these, there were 2452 uses on mentally ill subjects; and of these, 1111 (45.3%) were in situations where lethal force by the law enforcement agency would have been justified or where the subject represented an imminent life threat to himself.

Conclusion

The mentally ill represents a significant portion of subjects upon whom CEWs are used. These data suggest frequent use of CEWs in situations where deadly force would otherwise be justified and in situations where subjects exhibit imminent danger to themselves. These data also suggest that escalation to deadly force was avoided in many mental illness and suicidal situations by the presence of a CEW.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0735-6757(07)00172-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.02.030

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 25, Issue 7 , Pages 780-785, September 2007