American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 6 , Pages 649-654, July 2008

Utstein style study of cardiopulmonary bypass after cardiac arrest

  • Katsutoshi Tanno, MD

      Affiliations

    • Critical Care and Trauma Center, Caress Alliance Nikko Memorial Hospital, Muroran 051-8501, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 143 24 1331x8890; fax: +81 143 22 5296.
  • ,
  • Yasushi Itoh, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University
  • ,
  • Yoshihiro Takeyama, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University
  • ,
  • Satoshi Nara, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University
  • ,
  • Kazuhisa Mori, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University
  • ,
  • Yasufumi Asai, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University

Received 14 July 2007; received in revised form 27 September 2007; accepted 29 September 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe the effect emergency cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for resuscitation on the survival rate of patients.

Methods

The study population was composed of persons 16 years or older who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were transferred to the Sapporo Medical University Hospital from the scene between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2004. Children younger than 16 years and persons who were dead were excluded. Data were collected according to the Utstein style. Survival rates and cerebral performance category were analyzed using χ2 analysis for the patients with presumed cardiac etiology. Cardiopulmonary bypass was applied to patients who showed no response with standard advanced cardiac life support. The interval from collapse and other noncardiac etiologies were considered criteria for exclusion.

Results

Of the 919 patient medical records reviewed, CPB was performed in 92 patients. Of the 919 patients, 398 were of presumed cardiac etiology (n = 66 for CPB), 48 patients survived, and 24 patients (n = 7 for CPB) had a good cerebral outcome (cerebral performance category score 1). With CPB, the rate of survival at 3 months increased significantly (22.7% vs 9.9%, P < .05), but the rate of good cerebral outcome (10.6% vs 5.1%, P = .087) showed a positive trend.

Conclusion

The use of CPB for arrest patients was associated with reduced mortality. It did not increase good neurologic outcome significantly. Still, 7 cases with intact central nervous system would have been lost without CPB.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0735-6757(07)00653-5

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.09.019

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 6 , Pages 649-654, July 2008