A novel diversion protocol dramatically reduces diversion hours☆
Abstract
Introduction
Ambulance diversion is a problem in many communities. When patients are diverted prompt and appropriate medical care may be delayed.
Objective
Compare diversion hours and drop-off times before and after a dramatic change in diversion policy restricting each hospital to 1 hour out of every 8.
Methods
This study was a retrospective study in a county of 600
000 people and 10 hospitals from September 2004 to February 2006. A countywide diversion protocol was implemented in March 2005 that limited diversion hours to 1 hour out of every 8 (maximum of 90 h/mo). No other changes were implemented during the study period. Pretrial (9/04-2/05), interim (3/05-8/05), and posttrial (9/05-2/06) periods were compared. The main outcome measures were ambulance diversion hours and emergency medical service (EMS) drop-off times. Results were compared using analysis of variance and a Tukey post hoc analysis. P < .05 was considered significant.
Results
There was no significant difference in the number of monthly transports comparing the posttrial vs pretrial periods; however, a significant decrease in monthly ambulance diversion hours (difference, 251 hours; 95% CI, 136-368) and significant increase in additional time that EMS crews required to transport patients (drop-off times) (difference, 178 hours; 95% CI, 74-283) were observed. Posttrial diversion hours decreased to 18% of the pretrial values (from 305 to 54).
Conclusion
This novel ambulance diversion protocol dramatically reduced diversion hours at the cost of increasing EMS drop-off times in a large community.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ Funded in part by the Valente Foundation.
Presented at SAEM, May 2007, Chicago, Ill.
PII: S0735-6757(07)00698-5
doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.020
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
