American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 7 , Pages 773-778, September 2008

Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients

Department of Emergency Medicine, York Hospital, York, PA 17403-3676, USA

Received 18 July 2007; received in revised form 30 October 2007; accepted 30 October 2007.

Abstract 

Objectives

The San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR) is a decision rule with the potential to identify patients at risk for serious outcomes within 7 days of the emergency department (ED) visit for syncope. The initial studies of the SFSR reported a high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients, of all ages, with serious outcomes. Our objective was to determine if the SFSR can be safely and accurately applied to ED patients aged 65 and older with syncope or near-syncope.

Methods

A retrospective review of ED patients aged 65 years and older with syncope or near-syncope between January 2000 and August 2001 was performed. Charts were reviewed for evidence of SFSR risks for the ED visit and serious outcomes within 7 days of the ED visit.

Results

Of 773 subjects identified as having syncope or near-syncope, 517 subjects were included. There were 98 patients with serious outcomes. Twenty-three patients who were negative on SFSR had serious outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity of the SFSR were 76.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.7%-84.3%) and 36.8% (95% CI, 32.2%-41.6%), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 87.0% (95% CI, 80.9%-91.4%) and 22.1% (95% CI, 17.8%-26.9%), respectively.

Conclusions

In our cohort of elderly ED patients, the SFSR had a lower sensitivity and specificity. The SFSR may not be applicable to the elderly ED population. Future prospective validation is necessary before application to the ED elderly population.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the Fourth European Congress on Emergency Medicine, October 2006 (oral presentation); the National Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Conference, May 2006 (oral presentation); and the PA Chapter, American College of Emergency Physicians annual meeting, April 2006 (poster presentation).

PII: S0735-6757(07)00723-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.042

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 7 , Pages 773-778, September 2008