Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 856-858 (September 2009)


View previous. 22 of 44 View next.

Is female sex associated with ED delays to diagnosis of appendicitis in the computed tomography era?

Sarah McGann Donlan, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Mark B. Mycyk, MD

Received 24 April 2008; received in revised form 11 June 2008; accepted 12 June 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Historically, females had delays to definitive diagnosis of appendicitis when compared to males. In this current millennium, appendicitis is now most commonly diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED) rather than at surgery.

Objective

The aim of the study was to assess if female gender is still associated with delays to diagnosis of appendicitis in the CT era.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients with appendicitis at a university teaching hospital ED was conducted. Inclusion criteria was age of more than 18 years and an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), diagnosis of appendicitis. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were pregnant, no CT scan was obtained in the ED, or had incomplete outcome data.

Results

One hundred thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria; 65 female, 72 males. Time from triage to CT order was 138 minutes in females and 95 minutes in males (P = .0012). Time from initial physician evaluation to CT order was 45 minutes in females and 28 minutes in males (P = .0012). Nonclassic symptoms were more common in females and pelvic evaluation did not delay the CT order.

Conclusion

Female gender is still associated with delays to CT acquisition and diagnosis of appendicitis.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60610, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 312 694 7000; fax: +1 312 926 6274.

 Abstract presented at American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), October 9, 2007, Seattle, Wash.

PII: S0735-6757(08)00422-1

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.06.004


View previous. 22 of 44 View next.

Advertisement