Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 905-910 (October 2009)


View previous. 5 of 46 View next.

Determination of difficult intubation in the ED

Secgin Soyuncu, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Cenker Eken, MDemail address, Yildiray Cete, MDemail address, Firat Bektas, MDemail address, Mehmet Akcimen, MDemail address

Received 5 May 2008; received in revised form 30 June 2008; accepted 2 July 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study is to determine the predictors of difficult intubation in the emergency setting.

Methods

This prospective observational clinical study was conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a University Hospital with an annually census of 50 000 visits from May 2005 to May 2007. All patients requiring intubation in the ED were included into the study. During the study period, same airway management protocol was used all intubations. The study form included patient's demographic and variables according to intubation such as the Cormack-Lehane grade, modified LEMON score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, success rate, and associated complications.

Results

A total of 366 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the study patients was 46.8 ± 22.8, and 68.6% (n = 251) of them were male. A total of 86 (23.5%) patients were classified in the difficult intubation group and 280 (76.5%) patients in easy intubation group. Logistic regression analysis performed by the variables found to be significant in the univariate analysis revealed thyroid-to-hyoid distance less than 2 fingers (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-8.27; P = .009) as an independent factor complicating the intubation. Cormack and Lehane classification was strongly related to difficult intubation. Intubation was more difficult from grade 1 to 4 (11% vs 25.2% vs 34% vs 81.8%, respectively; P = .000).

Conclusions

The thyroid-to-hyoid distance less than 2 fingers is the only independent variable in predicting difficult intubation. Mallampati classification is not a useful tool in classifying the difficult intubation in the ED that the “LEMON” acrostic can be modified to “LEON”.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, 07059 Antalya, Turkey

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90 242 2496183; fax: +90 242 2274490.

 This study was supported by Akdeniz University Foundation.

PII: S0735-6757(08)00524-X

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.003


View previous. 5 of 46 View next.

Advertisement