American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 9 , Pages 1141-1146, November 2011

A novel hands-free carotid ultrasound detects low-flow cardiac output in a swine model of pulseless electrical activity arrest☆☆

  • Todd M. Larabee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80045, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 720 848 6777; fax: +1 720 848 7374.
  • ,
  • Charles M. Little, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80045, USA
  • ,
  • Balasundar I. Raju, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Philips Research, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA
  • ,
  • Eric Cohen-Solal, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Philips Research, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA
  • ,
  • Ramon Erkamp, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Philips Research, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA
  • ,
  • Scott Wuthrich, MSE

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA 01810, USA
  • ,
  • John Petruzzello

      Affiliations

    • Philips Research, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, USA
  • ,
  • Michael Nakagawa, MSE

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA 01810, USA
  • ,
  • Shervin Ayati, MSE

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA 01810, USA

Received 13 November 2009; received in revised form 6 May 2010; accepted 24 May 2010. published online 16 August 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To determine if a hands-free, noninvasive Doppler ultrasound device can reliably detect low-flow cardiac output by measuring carotid artery blood flow velocities. We compared the ability of observers to detect carotid artery flow velocity differences between pseudo-pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and true-PEA cardiac arrest.

Methods

Five swine were instrumented with aortic (Ao) and right atrial pressure-transducing catheters. The Doppler ultrasound device was adhered to the neck over the carotid artery. Continuous electrocardiogram, pressure readings, and Doppler signal were recorded. Each swine underwent multiple episodes of fibrillation and resuscitation. Episodes of true-PEA and pseudo-PEA were retrospectively identified from all resuscitation attempts by examination of electrocardiogram and Ao waveforms. The sensitivity and specificity of the device to detect pseudo-PEA was obtained using observers blinded to Ao waveform recordings.

Results

There was good interobserver reliability related to identification of pseudo- and true-PEA (κ = 0.873). The observers blinded to Ao waveform recordings agreed on 8 of the 9 episodes of pseudo-PEA, whereas 4 false positives of 26 true-PEA events were reported (sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.85). The Doppler device was able to detect carotid flow velocity over a wide range of Ao blood pressures.

Conclusions

This hands-free, noninvasive Doppler ultrasound device can reliably differentiate pseudo-PEA from true-PEA during resuscitation from cardiac arrest, detecting pressure gradient changes of less than 5 mm Hg through to normotension. This device distinguishes conditions of no cardiac output from low cardiac output and may have applications for use during resuscitation from various etiologies of arrest and shock.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial support: This work was supported by Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Mass.

☆☆ Presented as an abstract at the American Heart Association Resuscitation Sciences Symposium, Chicago, Ill, November, 2006 [Circulation (supplement) 2006. 114(18): II-1207].

 Conflict of interest statement: This study was funded by Philips Medical Systems. Dr Larabee and Dr Little received financial support for the performance of this study and have no financial interest in the device. All other investigators are employed by Philips Medical Systems.

PII: S0735-6757(10)00236-6

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.013

American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 29, Issue 9 , Pages 1141-1146, November 2011