Advertisement

Effectiveness of reduction maneuvers in the treatment of nursemaid's elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Published:November 02, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.059

      Abstract

      Background/Aim

      Nursemaid's elbow usually occurs in young children when longitudinal traction is placed on the arm. Several manipulative maneuvers have been described, although, the most effective treatment technique is yet unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the two most commonly performed maneuvers (supination-flexion and hyperpronation) in the treatment of nursemaid's elbow.

      Methods

      A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing supination-flexion and hyperpronation. Data were extracted and pooled independently by two authors. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model in case of homogeneity across studies, and using a random-effect model in case of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was calculated with the χ2 test and inconsistency in study effects across trials was quantified by I2 values.

      Results

      Seven randomized trials, including 701 patients (62% female), were included. A total of 350 patients were treated with the hyperpronation maneuver versus 351 patients who underwent the supination-flexion maneuver. Meta-analysis showed that hyperpronation was more effective than supination-flexion (risk ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.49; I2, 35%). The absolute risk difference between maneuvers was 26% in favor of hyperpronation, resulting in a number needed to treat of 4 patients. Trials lacked blinding of assessors and universal pain measures.

      Conclusions

      Hyperpronation was more effective in terms of success rate and seems to be less painful compared to the supination-flexion maneuver in children with nursemaid's elbow.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Egol K.A.
        • Strauss E.J.
        Emergency room orthopaedic procedures: an illustrative guide for the house officer.
        JP Medical Ltd, 2012
        • Schunk J.F.
        Radial head subluxation: epidemiology and treatment of 87 episodes.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19: 1019-1023
        • Schutzman S.A.
        • Teach S.
        Upper-extremity impairment in young children.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26: 474-479
        • Vitello S.
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of nursemaid's elbow.
        Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014; 15: 554
        • Hardy R.
        Nursemaid's elbow.
        J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978; 28: 224-226
        • Matles A.
        • Eliopoulos K.
        Internal derangement of the elbow in children.
        Int Surg. 1967; 48: 259-263
        • Macias C.G.
        • Bothner J.
        • Wiebe R.
        A comparison of supination/flexion to hyperpronation in the reduction of radial head subluxations.
        Pediatrics. 1998; 102: e10
        • McDonald J.
        • Whitelaw C.
        • Goldsmith L.J.
        Radial head subluxation: comparing two methods of reduction.
        Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 715-718
        • Green D.A.
        • et al.
        Randomized comparison of pain perception during radial head subluxation reduction using supination-flexion or forced pronation.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22: 235-238
        • Bek D.
        • et al.
        Pronation versus supination maneuvers for the reduction of ‘pulled elbow’: a randomized clinical trial.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 135-138
        • Stoll B.J.
        • Kliegman R.
        Blood disorders.
        in: Nelson text book of pediatrics. 2004: 601-606
        • McMillan J.A.
        • et al.
        Oski's pediatrics: principles & practice.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006
        • Meckler G.D.
        • Spiro D.M.
        Technical tip: radial head subluxation.
        Pediatr Rev. 2008; 29: e42-e43
        • Liberati A.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: W-65-W-94
        • Institute J.B.
        Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual: 2014 edition.
        The Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide2014
        • Gunaydin Y.K.
        • et al.
        Comparison of success and pain levels of supination-flexion and hyperpronation maneuvers in childhood nursemaid's elbow cases.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31: 1078-1081
        • García-Mata S.
        • Hidalgo-Ovejero A.
        Efficacy of reduction maneuvers for “pulled elbow” in children: a prospective study of 115 cases.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2014; 34: 432-436
        • Guzel M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of hyperpronation and supination-flexion techniques in children presented to emergency department with painful pronation.
        Niger J Clin Pract. 2014; 17: 201-204
        • Krul M.
        • et al.
        Manipulative interventions for reducing pulled elbow in young children.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 1
        • Neven A.K.
        • Eekhof J.
        Zondagmiddagarmpje.
        Huisarts en wetenschap. 2008; 51: 688-690
        • Taha A.M.
        The treatment of pulled elbow: a prospective randomized study.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120: 336-337