Advertisement

How alternative payment models in emergency medicine can benefit physicians, payers, and patients

Published:March 13, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.025

      Abstract

      While there has been considerable effort devoted to developing alternative payment models (APMs) for primary care physicians and for episodes of care beginning with inpatient admissions, there has been relatively little attention by payers to developing APMs for specialty ambulatory care, and no efforts to develop APMs that explicitly focus on emergency care. In order to ensure that emergency care is appropriately integrated and valued in future payment models, emergency physicians (EPs) must engage with the stakeholders within the broader health care system. In this article, we describe a framework for the development of APMs for emergency medicine and present four examples of APMs that may be applicable in emergency medicine. A better understanding of how APMs can work in emergency medicine will help EPs develop new APMs that improve the cost and quality of care, and leverage the value that emergency care brings to the system.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • de Brantes F.
        Bundled Payment in the U.S.: The Slow March Is Almost Over.
        N Engl J Med Catalyst. November 2015; (Available from:)
        • Burwell S.M.
        Setting value-based payment goals — HHS efforts to improve U.S. health care.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 897-899
        • Pines J.M.
        • George M.
        • McStay F.
        • McClellan M.
        Successful acute care payment reform requires working with the emergency department.
        in: Health Affairs Blog. May 5. 2015 (Available from:)
        • Miller H.D.
        From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care.
        Health Aff. 2009; 28: 1418-1428
        • Miller H.D.
        The Building Blocks of Successful Payment Reform.
        Payment Reform Series #3. Network for Regional Healthcare Improvement. June 2015
      1. A Guide to Physician Alternative Payment - Focused Models.
        American Medical Association, November 2015
      2. Emergency Department (ED): Median Time From ED Arrival to ED Departure for Admitted ED Patients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Available from: https://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/summaries/summary/49171/emergency-department-ed-median-time-from-ed-arrival-to-ed-departure-for-admitted-ed-patients?q=0495.

        • David C.V.
        • Chira S.
        • Eells S.J.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy in patients admitted to hospitals with cellulitis.
        Dermatol Online J. 2011; 17: 1
        • Rutten J.H.W.
        • Steyerberg E.W.
        • Boomsma F.
        • et al.
        N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide testing in the emergency department: beneficial effects on hospitalization, costs, and outcome.
        Am Heart J. 2008; 156: 71-77
        • Kline J.A.
        • Mitchell A.M.
        • Kabrhel C.
        • Richman P.B.
        • Courtney D.M.
        Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
        J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2: 1247-1255
        • Hoffman J.R.
        • Mower W.R.
        • Wolfson A.B.
        • Todd K.H.
        • Zucker M.I.
        Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study Group.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 94-99