Advertisement

Propofol–fentanyl versus propofol–ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma

Published:February 02, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.080

      Abstract

      Objective

      Many procedures performed in emergency department are stressful and painful, and creating proper and timely analgesia and early and effective assessment are the challenges in this department. This study has been conducted in order to compare the efficacy of propofol and fentanyl combination with propofol and ketamine combination for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in trauma patients in the emergency department.

      Method

      This is a randomized prospective double-blind clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Hospital, a tertiary academic trauma center in northern Iran. Patients with trauma presenting to the emergency department who needed PSA were included in study. Patients were divided into two groups of propofol fentanyl (PF) and propofol ketamine (PK). Pain score and sedation depth were set as primary outcome measures and were recorded.

      Results

      Out of about 379 patients with trauma, who needed PSA, 253 met the criteria to be included in the study, 117 of which were excluded. The remaining 136 patients were randomly allocated to either PF group (n = 70) or PK group (n = 66). Pain management after drug administration was significantly different between the groups and the analgesia caused by fentanyl was significantly higher than ketamine. The sedation score after 15 min of PSA in the group PF was significantly higher than the group PK.

      Conclusion

      It seems that regarding PSA in the emergency department, PF caused better analgesia and deeper sedation and it is recommended to use PF for PSA in the emergency departments.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Todd K.H.
        • Ducharme J.
        • Choiniere M.
        • Crandall C.S.
        • Fosnocht D.E.
        • Homel P.
        • et al.
        Pain in the emergency department: results of the Pain and Emergency Medicine Initiative (PEMI) Multicenter Study.
        J Pain. 2007; 8: 460-466
        • Migita Russell T.
        • Klein Eileen J.
        • Michelle M.
        Garrison, sedation and analgesia for pediatric fracture reduction in the emergency department. A systematic review.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jan; 160: 46-51
        • Barkan S.
        • Breitbart R.
        • Brenner-Zada G.
        • et al.
        A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of oral midazolam plus oral ketamine for sedation of children during laceration repaire.
        Emerg Med J. 2014; 31: 649-653
        • Godwin S.A.
        • Caro D.A.
        • Wolf S.J.
        • et al.
        Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45: 177-196
        • Bordo D.
        • Chan S.B.
        • Shin P.
        Patient satisfaction and return to daily activities using etomidate procedural sedation for orthopedic injuries.
        West J Emerg Med. 2008; 9: 86-90
        • Bawden J.
        • Villa-Roel C.
        • Singh M.
        • et al.
        Procedural sedation and analgesia in a Canadian ED: a time-in-motion study.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011; 29: 1083-1088
        • DAS-Taskforce 2015
        • Baron Ralf
        • Binder Andreas
        • Biniek Rolf
        • Braune Stephan
        • et al.
        Evidence and consensus based guideline for the management of delirium, analgesia, and sedation in intensive care medicine. Revision 2015 (DAS-Guideline 2015) — short version.
        Ger Med Sci. 2015; 13Doc19
        • Pinto R.F.
        • Bhimani M.
        • Milne W.K.
        • Nicholson K.
        Procedural sedation and analgesia in rural and regional emergency departments.
        Can J Rural Med. 2013 Fall; 18: 130-136
        • Stolz D.
        • Kurer G.
        • Meyer A.
        • Chhajed P.N.
        • Pflimlin E.
        • Strobel W.
        • et al.
        Propofol versus combined sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised non-inferiority trial.
        Eur Respir J. 2009; 34: 1024-1030
        • Gaisl T.
        • Bratton D.J.
        • Heuss L.T.
        • Kohler M.
        • Schlatzer C.
        • Zalunardo M.P.
        • et al.
        Sedation during bronchoscopy: data from a nationwide sedation and monitoring survey.
        BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 5; 16: 113
        • Yan J.W.
        • McLeod S.L.
        • Iansavitchene A.
        Ketamine-propofol versus propofol alone for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 22: 1003-1013
      1. Wakai A,Blackburn C, Mccabe A, Reece E, O'Connor G, et al. The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD007399.

        • Khutia S.K.
        • Mandal M.C.
        • Das S.
        • Basu S.R.
        Intravenous infusion of ketamine-propofol can be an alternative to intravenous infusion of fentanyl-propofol for deep sedation and analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing emergency short surgical procedures.
        Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Mar; 56: 145-150
        • Chiaretti A.
        • Ruggiero A.
        • Barone G.
        • Antonelli A.
        • Lazzareschi I.
        • Genovese O.
        • et al.
        Propofol/alfentanil and propofol/ketamine procedural sedation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: safety, efficacy and their correlation with pain neuromediator expression.
        Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Mar; 19 (May 21): 212-220
        • Bahrami Gorji F.
        • Amri P.
        • Shokri J.
        • Alereza H.
        • Bijani A.
        Sedative and analgesic effects of propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
        Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Aug 22; 6 (eCollection 2016 Oct)e39835
        • Tosun Z.
        • Aksu R.
        • Guler G.
        • Esmaoglu A.
        • Akin A.
        • Aslan D.
        • et al.
        Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Paediatr Anaesth. 2007; 17: 983-988
        • Kb N.
        • Cherian A.
        • Balachander H.
        • Kumar C.Y.
        Comparison of propofol and ketamine versus propofol and fentanyl for puerperal sterilization, a randomized clinical trial.
        J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May; 8: GC01-4
        • Haytural C.
        • Aydınlı B.
        • Demir B.
        • Bozkurt E.
        • Parlak E.
        • Dişibeyaz S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of propofol, propofol-remifentanil, and propofol-fentanyl administrations with each other used for the sedation of patients to undergo ERCP.
        Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015465465
        • Akin A.
        • Guler G.
        • Esmaoglu A.
        • Bedirli N.
        • Boyaci A.
        A comparison of fentanyl-propofol with a ketamine-propofol combination for sedation during endometrial biopsy.
        J Clin Anesth. 2005; 17: 187-190
        • Singh R.
        • Ghazanwy M.
        • Vajifdar H.
        A randomized controlled trial to compare fentanyl-propofol and ketamine-propofol combination for procedural sedation and analgesia in laparoscopic tubal ligation.
        Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jan; 7: 24-28
        • Cevik E.
        • Bilgic S.
        • Kilic E.
        • Cinar O.
        • Hasman H.
        • Acar A.Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison of ketamine-low-dose midozolam with midazolam-fentanyl for orthopedic emergencies: a double-blind randomized trial.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan; 31: 108-113