Advertisement

Epicardial versus parietal pericardial defibrillation

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      This study evaluated the energy requirements for porous electrodes implanted on the parietal pericardium versus those for porous electrodes implanted on the epicardial surface of the heart. Defibrillation with a 2.5-cm porous electrode implanted on the parietal pericardium was successful in 42% of all episodes of ventricular fibrillation. The minimal energy requirement ranged from 30–68 J, with an average of 46 J. Epicardial defibrillation was successful in approximately 80% of all episodes. The average maximal energy was 21.3 J. There was histological evidence of subepicardial damage in the parietal defibrillation group. This may be related to the higher energy required to defibrillate in this group. However, in this group frequent, large, external shocks were required to defibrillate the dog's hearts. Theoretically, there may be some physiological and surgical advantages to an intact pericardium. However, the high energy requirement and the low success rate for defibrillation with a porous electrode on the parietal pericardium negate the feaslbility of this route of defibrillation with a permanent implantable system.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Watkin Jr., L
        • Mirowski M
        • Mower MM
        • et al.
        Implantation of the automatic defibrillator: The subxiphoid approach.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1982; 34: 515-520
        • Rubin L
        • Hudson P
        • Driller J
        An evaluation of left intraventricular defibrillation.
        in: 3rd Defibrillation Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IndianaSeptember 1979
        • Rubin L
        • Hudson P
        • et al.
        Defibrillation threshold energy and electrode size.
        in: 2nd Defibrillation Conference, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IndianaSeptember 1977
        • Rubin L
        • Hudson P
        • Driller J
        A comparison of electrodes for Pervenous Defibrillation.
        in: Proceeding of the AAMI 12th Annual Meeting. 1976: 408
        • Rubin L
        • Cantinella F
        • Nathan J
        Epicardial defibrillation with a permanent porous electrode.
        in: 17th Annual Meeting of Assn. for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), San Francisco1982
        • MacGregor DC
        • Wilson GJ
        • Lexfeld W
        The Porous Surfaced electrode.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979; 78: 281-291
        • Rubin L
        • Hudson P
        Epicardial defibrillation with a permanent porous electrode: A histopathological study.
        in: 4th Purdue Conference on Cardiac Defibrillation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IndianaSeptember 1981
        • Barnard HL
        The functions of the pericardium.
        J Physiol. 1898; 22: 43-48
        • Holt JP
        The normal pericardium.
        Am J Cardiol. 1970; 26: 455-465