The use of mechanical ventilation in the ED☆☆☆★★★
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 754 2339; fax: +1 617 754 2350.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 617 754 2339; fax: +1 617 754 2350.

Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Fig. 1
Flow of patients through the study.
Fig. 2
Visit rate per 1000 US population by year and visit type. Vertical bars represent standard error.
Fig. 3
In-hospital mortality by visit type. Vertical bars represent standard error.
Fig. 4
Median ED LOS by year and visit type.
Abstract
Objectives
Although EDs are responsible for the initial care of critically ill patients and the amount of critical care provided in the ED is increasing, there are few data examining mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ED. In addition, characteristics of ED-based ventilation may affect planning for ventilator shortages during pandemic influenza or bioterrorist events. The study examined the epidemiology of MV in US EDs, including demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics; indications for MV; ED length of stay (LOS); and in-hospital mortality.
Methods
This study was a retrospective review of the 1993 to 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED data sets. Ventilated patients were compared with ED patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to all other ED visits.
Results
There were 3.6 million ED MV visits (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-4.0 million) over the study period. Sex, age, race, and payment source were similar for mechanically ventilated and ICU patients (P > .05 for all). Approximately 12.5% of ventilated patients underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with 1.7% of ICU admissions and 0.2% of all other ED visits (P < .0001). Accordingly, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for ventilated patients (24%; 95% CI, 13.1%-34.9%) than both comparison groups (9.3% and 2.5%, respectively). Median LOS for ventilated patients was 197 minutes (interquartile range, 112-313 minutes) compared with 224 minutes for ICU admissions and 140 minutes for all other ED visits.
Conclusions
Patients undergoing ED MV have particularly high in-hospital mortality rates, but their ED LOS is sufficient for implementation of evidence-based ventilator interventions.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Sources of Support: Emergency Medicine Foundation/Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Medical Student Research Grant awarded to BDE.
☆☆Harvard Medical School PASTEUR Program grant awarded to BDE.
★Prior presentations: New England Emergency Medicine Research Directors Regional Meeting Poster Presentation March 18, 2009 Worcester, Mass.
★★American College of Emergency Physicians Scientific Assembly Research Forum, Poster Presentation, October 5, 2009, Boston, Mass.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
