Diagnostic testing and the average absolute likelihood ratio: application to diagnosing wide QRS complex tachycardia and other ED diseases☆☆☆
Correspondence
- Zero Emerson Place, Suite 3B, Boston, MA 02114. Tel.: + 1 617 726 6636; fax: + 1 617 724 0917.

Correspondence
- Zero Emerson Place, Suite 3B, Boston, MA 02114. Tel.: + 1 617 726 6636; fax: + 1 617 724 0917.

Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Fig. 1
The LR and regression modeling.
Fig. 2
d-Dimer and PE CT algorithm for diagnosing PE.
Fig. 3
QRS interval and wide QRS tachycardia diagnosis.
Fig. 4
Joint interval LRs for VT as a function of QRS duration and axis.
Abstract
The Bayesian approach to disease diagnosis in the emergency department is facilitated by the use of likelihood ratios (LRs) to evaluate diagnostic tests. The use of dichotomous, interval, and joint LRs for single and multiple tests is reviewed, and comparison is made to regression modeling.
The clinical motivation for a single statistic to describe the average change in the odds of disease associated with the use of a particular test or series of tests is described. This new extension of the LR concept is termed the average absolute LR (AALR).
Illustrative examples include the use of elevated electrocardiogram ST segment and troponin to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, and serum d-dimer and computed tomographic angiography to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Finally, a detailed example with original data demonstrating the use of the AALR to compare QRS duration, QRS axis, and the 2 tests combined to diagnose ventricular tachycardia in patients with stable sustained regular wide QRS tachycardia is provided. Application of both tests together to patients with wide QRS complex tachycardia changes the odds of ventricular tachycardia, on average, by a factor of 3.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.4-6.2). Challenges are described, and methods are provided to estimate the 95% confidence interval of the LR and AALR using bootstrapping techniques. The AALR is a test statistic that may be helpful for clinicians and researchers in evaluating and comparing diagnostic testing approaches.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Financial support and financial interests for this work: None.
☆☆Prior presentation: Abstract poster presentation, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL; May 12, 2012.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
