Sustainable emergency medical service systems: how much energy do we need?☆
Affiliations
- Mt. Isa Centre for Rural and Remote Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Mt. Isa Centre for Rural and Remote Health, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810 Australia.

Affiliations
- Mt. Isa Centre for Rural and Remote Health, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Mt. Isa Centre for Rural and Remote Health, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810 Australia.

Affiliations
- Alberta Health Services Emergency Medical Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, Alberta, Canada
Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Figure
Estimated annual life cycle energy requirements of US EMS systems (PJ) (mean, 95% CI).
Abbreviations: PJ, petajoule; ‘Petroleum,’ petroleum and refineries sector; ‘Retail,’ retail trade sector.
Abstract
Objective
Modern emergency medical service (EMS) systems are vulnerable to both rising energy prices and potential energy shortages. Ensuring the sustainability of EMS systems requires an empirical understanding of the total energy requirements of EMS operations. This study was undertaken to determine the life cycle energy requirements of US EMS systems.
Methods
Input-output–based energy requirement multipliers for the US economy were applied to the annual budgets for a random sample of 19 metropolitan or county-wide EMS systems. Calculated per capita energy requirements of the EMS systems were used to estimate nationwide EMS energy requirements, and the leading energy sinks of the EMS supply chain were determined.
Results
Total US EMS-related energy requirements are estimated at 30 to 60 petajoules (1015 J) annually. Direct (“scope 1”) energy consumption, primarily in the form of vehicle fuels but also in the form of natural gas and heating oil, accounts for 49% of all EMS-related energy requirements. The energy supply chain—including system electricity consumption (“scope 2”) as well as the upstream (“scope 3”) energy required to generate and distribute liquid fuels and natural gas—accounts for 18% of EMS energy requirements. Scope 3 energy consumption in the materials supply chain accounts for 33% of EMS energy requirements. Vehicle purchases, leases, maintenance, and repair are the most energy-intense components of the non-energy EMS supply chain (23%), followed by medical supplies and equipment (21%).
Conclusion
Although less energy intense than other aspects of the US healthcare system, ground EMS systems require substantial amounts of energy each year.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Presented in part at the National Association of EMS Physicians Annual Meeting, Tucson, Arizona, January 2014.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
