Advertisement
Advanced Search
To read this article in full, please review your options for gaining access at the bottom of the page.

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Figures

Fig. 1

Percentage of patients with Multiple UEF from total UEF patients in each type of RTA.

Fig. 2

Percentage of patients with associated injuries from total UEF patients in each type of RTA.

Fig. 3

Percentage of patients with associated injuries from total UEF patients in each type of RTA by body region.

Fig. 4

Distribution of fracture type among upper extremities fractures.

Fig. 5

Distribution of fracture type among upper extremities fractures in each type of RTA.

Abstract

Background

Upper extremity fractures (UEFs) associated with road traffic accidents (RTAs) may result in long-term disability. Previous studies have examined UEF profiles with small patient populations. The objective of this study was to examine the injury profiles of UEFs in all mechanisms of injury related to RTAs.

Methods

Data on 71231 RTA adult patients between 1997 and 2012 whose records were entered in a centralized country trauma database were reviewed. Data on UEFs related to mechanism of injury (car, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian) including associated injuries, multiple UEFs, and frequency of UEF were analyzed.

Results

Of 71,231 adult RTA cases recorded in 1997–2012, 12,754 (17.9%) included UEFs. Motorcycle (27%) and bicycle riders (25%) had the greater risk for UEF (P < .0001). Of 12754 patients with UEFs, 9701 (76%) had other injuries. Pedestrians (86%) and car occupants (81%) had the greater risk for associated injuries (P < .0001). Most of the injuries were head/face/neck (52%), lower extremities (49%), and chest (46%) injuries (P < .0001). Twenty-two percent of all cases had multiple UEFs. The motorcycle riders (27%) had the greater risk for multiple UEFs (P < .0001). Of 12754 patients with UEFs we found 16371 UEFs. Most of the fractures were in the radius (22%), humerus (19%), and clavicle (17%) (P < .0001).

Conclusions

This study contributes the largest database on reported adult UEFs related to all mechanisms of injury in RTAs and finds the comparative epidemiology of associated injuries, multiple UEFs, and frequency of UEFs. It is important that the treating surgeon is aware of the complexity of the UEF patient, the strong possibility for associated injury, the possibility for multiple fractures in the upper limbs, and the most common fractures associated with each mechanism of accident.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

☆☆This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement