Diagnostic performance of cardiopulmonary ultrasound performed by the emergency physician in the management of acute dyspnea☆
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Service d’Accueil des Urgences, CHG Lourdes, 65100 Lourdes, France.

Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Service d’Accueil des Urgences, CHG Lourdes, 65100 Lourdes, France.


Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche, Laboratoire d’Épidémiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, France
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Centre Francophone de Formation en Echographie, Centre Médical Delta, Nîmes, France
Affiliations
- Emergency, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care Department, Lourdes Hospital, Lourdes, France
Affiliations
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Toulouse University Hospital, University Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Fig. 1
Cardiac ultrasound data: mitral Doppler in pulsed mode and tissue Doppler on the lateral edge of the mitral annulus on the apical 4 chamber view.
Fig. 2
Interpretation of cardiac ultrasound data.
Fig. 3
Lung ultrasound signs used and typical profiles searched.
Fig. 4
Distribution of patients according to the result of the 2 ultrasounds and, depending on the final diagnosis, by the independent experts.
Abstract
Objective
The etiologic diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the emergency department (ED) remains difficult, especially for elderly patients or those with previous cardiorespiratory medical history. This may lead to inappropriate treatment and potentially a higher mortality rate. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of cardiopulmonary ultrasound compared with usual care for the etiologic diagnosis of acute dyspnea in the ED.
Methods
Patients admitted to the ED for acute dyspnea underwent upon arrival a cardiopulmonary ultrasound performed by an emergency physician, in addition to standard care. The performances of the clinical examination, chest x-ray, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and cardiopulmonary ultrasound were compared with the final diagnosis made by 2 independent physicians.
Results
One hundred thirty patients were analyzed. For the diagnosis of acute left-sided heart failure, cardiopulmonary ultrasound had an accuracy of 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84-95) vs 67% (95% CI, 57-75), P = .0001 for clinical examination, and 81% (95% CI, 72-88), P = .04 for the combination “clinical examination–NT-proBNP–x-ray”. Cardiopulmonary ultrasound led to the diagnosis of pneumonia or pleural effusion with an accuracy of 86% (95% CI, 80-92) and decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma with an accuracy of 95% (95% CI, 92-99). Cardiopulmonary ultrasound lasted an average of 12 ± 3 minutes.
Conclusions
Cardiopulmonary ultrasounds performed in the ED setting allow one to rapidly establish the etiology of acute dyspnea with an accuracy of 90%.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
