Emergent diagnostic testing for pediatric nonfebrile seizures☆
Affiliations
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland, 110 South Paca St, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Affiliations
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland, 110 South Paca St, 6th Floor, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Affiliations
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Affiliations
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
Background
Guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology recommend laboratory studies or computed tomography (CT) for children who experience a nonfebrile seizure if anything in their history suggests a clinically significant abnormality.
Objective
To ascertain if any patient or seizure characteristics are associated with a greater likelihood that laboratory studies or CT scan will yield clinically significant results.
Methods
This retrospective case series reviewed 93 children with nonfebrile seizure, who were evaluated in an urban pediatric emergency department (ED) between July 2007 and June 2011.
Results
Laboratory studies were performed in 87% of the study group; 7% of those tests gave clinically significant results. Computed tomographic scans were obtained in 35% of our patients; 9% showed clinically significant findings. Presence of an active seizure in the ED or a first nonfebrile seizure had an 8% and 11% difference, respectively, for clinically significant laboratory abnormality. Children younger than 2 years showed a 7% difference of clinically significant laboratory abnormality.
Conclusion
This study did not identify statistically significant predictors of laboratory or CT abnormalities for children with nonfebrile seizure presenting to the ED. Age less than 2 years, having an active seizure in the ED, and experiencing a first-time seizure showed a trend toward an increased yield of laboratory testing. In accordance with the American Academy of Neurology guidelines, we conclude that the history of a child's present illness preceding the nonfebrile seizure, not characteristics of the seizure, should be used to determine the need for further testing.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆No disclosures.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
