Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation training experience and self-efficacy of age and gender group: a nationwide community survey
Affiliations
- Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 2 2072 3257; fax: +82 2 741 7855.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 2 2072 3257; fax: +82 2 741 7855.

Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Affiliations
- Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungbuk, Republic of Korea

Affiliations
- Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chungbuk, Republic of Korea

Affiliations
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
Background
We hypothesized that recent hands-on practice for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would be strongly associated with a higher likelihood of self-efficacy in bystander CPR among laypersons according to age and gender group.
Methods
We used the National Korean Community Health Survey database of 228921 representatively sampled responders from 253 counties in 2012. Laypersons who had previous CPR training were eligible. Exposure variables were having had CPR training with hands-on practice session with a manikin (Practical-CPR-Training) and CPR training within the last 2 years (Recent-CPR-Training). Primary outcome was self-efficacy in bystander CPR. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. The final model with an interaction term was evaluated to compare the effects of CPR training across different age and gender groups.
Results
Of 62425 eligible respondents who have had CPR training, 20213 (32.4%) had Practical-CPR-Training. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for self-efficacy were 4.08 (3.78-4.41) in Practical-CPR-Training, 2.61 (2.50-2.73) in male, 1.26 (1.16-1.36) in good self-rated health, 1.19 (1.10-1.29) in high school graduate, 1.19 (1.01-1.39) in persons living with stroke patients in household, and 1.17 (1.10-1.24) in Recent-CPR-Training. In interaction models, Practical-CPR-Training showed higher self-efficacy in all age and gender groups, whereas Recent-CPR-Training was not associated with better self-efficacy in elderly group, male (AOR, 0.90 [0.69-1.18]) and female (AOR, 0.94 [0.72-1.23]).
Conclusion
Self-efficacy in bystander CPR was higher in person with recent CPR training with hands-on practice with a manikin.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
