Fiberoptic intubation or video tube for trauma patient intubation—which method to choose? Randomized crossover manikin trial☆☆☆
Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 4 Lindleya Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland. Tel.: +48 502258562.

Correspondence
- Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 4 Lindleya Str., 02-005 Warsaw, Poland. Tel.: +48 502258562.

Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Fig. 1
Devices used in trial. Intubation fiberscope OLYMPUS MAF TYPE GM) A), the video tube ETView VivaSight SL (B), the view of vocal cords with Intubation Fiberoscop OLYMPUS MAF TYPE GM (C), and the view of vocal cords with video tube ETView VivaSight SL (D).
Fig. 2
Flowchart of design and recruitment of participants according to CONSORT statement.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
☆Author's contributions: conception and design: L.S., L.C., Z.T., M.M.; analysis and interpretation: L.S., L.C.; drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: L.S., L.C., Z.T., M.M.
☆☆Source of support: No sources of financial and material support to be declared.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
