Advertisement

Hand dominance in intravenous drug using patients does not affect peripheral venous access sites identified by ultrasound

Published:February 20, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.049

      Abstract

      Background

      The peripheral veins in the arms and forearms of patients with a history of intravenous (IV) drug use may be sclerosed, calcified, or collapsed due to damage from previous injections. These patients may consequently require alternative, more invasive types of vascular access including central venous or intraosseous catheters.
      We investigated the relationship between hand dominance and the presence of patent upper extremity (UE) veins specifically in patients with a history of IV drug-use. We predicted that injection into the non-dominant UE would occur with a higher frequency than the dominant UE, leading to fewer damaged veins in the dominant UE. If hand dominance affects which upper extremity has more patent veins, providers could focus their first vascular access attempt on the dominant upper extremity.

      Methods

      Adult patients were approached for enrollment if they provided a history of IV drug use into one of their upper extremities. Each upper extremity was examined with a high frequency linear transducer in 3 areas: the antecubital crease, forearm and the proximal arm. The number of fully compressible veins ≥1.8 mm in diameter was recorded for each location.

      Results

      The mean vein difference between the numbers of veins in the dominant versus the non-dominant UE was −1.5789. At a .05 significance level, there was insufficient evidence to suggest the number of compressible veins between patients' dominant and non-dominant arms was significantly different (P = .0872.)

      Conclusions

      The number of compressible veins visualized with ultrasound was not greater in the dominant upper extremity as expected. Practitioners may gain more information about potential peripheral venous access sites by asking patients their previous injection practice patterns.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Constantino T.G.
        • Parikh A.K.
        • Satz W.A.
        • Fojtik J.P.
        Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46: 456-461
        • Keyes L.E.
        • Frazee B.W.
        • Snoey E.R.
        • Simon B.C.
        • Christy D.
        Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34: 711-714
        • Stein J.C.
        • Cole W.
        • Kramer N.
        • Quinn J.
        Ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult IV access.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 581-582
        • Panebianco N.L.
        • Fredette J.M.
        • Szyld D.
        • Sagalyn E.B.
        • Pines J.M.
        • Dean A.J.
        What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 1298-1303
        • Emergency ultrasound guidelines
        American college Of emergency physicians.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Apr; 53: 550-570