Advertisement

Which intravascular access method to choose during cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

Published:February 29, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.061
      We read with great interest the paper by Cho et al [
      • Cho T.
      • Komasawa N.
      • Haba M.
      • Fujiwara S.
      • Mihara R.
      • Minami T.
      Needle guides for venous catheter insertion during chest compressions: A crossover simulation trial.
      ] describing needle guides for venous catheter insertion during chest compressions. They use needle guides during ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization (CVC) with and without chest compressions on manikin. Catheterization was performed by anesthesiologists stuff.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cho T.
        • Komasawa N.
        • Haba M.
        • Fujiwara S.
        • Mihara R.
        • Minami T.
        Needle guides for venous catheter insertion during chest compressions: A crossover simulation trial.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.036
        • Stein J.
        • George B.
        • River G.
        • Hebig A.
        • McDermott D.
        Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54: 33-40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.048
        • Reades R.
        • Studnek J.R.
        • Vandeventer S.
        • Garrett J.
        Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 58: 509-516https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.020
        • Leung J.
        • Duffy M.
        • Finckh A.
        Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48: 540-547
        • Leidel B.A.
        • Kirchhoff C.
        • Bogner V.
        • Braunstein V.
        • Biberthaler P.
        • Kanz K.G.
        Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins.
        Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 40-45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.017
        • Kurowski A.
        • Timler D.
        • Evrin T.
        • Szarpak Ł.
        Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. randomized crossover manikin study.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32: 1490-1493https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.007
        • Johnson D.
        • Giles K.
        • Acuna A.
        • Saenz C.
        • Bentley M.
        • Budinich C.
        Effects of tibial intraosseous and intravenous administration of vasopressin on kinetics and survivability in cardiac arrest.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2015; ([pii: S0735-6757(15)01005–0].)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.027
        • Lee P.M.
        • Lee C.
        • Rattner P.
        • Wu X.
        • Gershengorn H.
        • Acquah S.
        Intraosseous versus central venous catheter utilization and performance during inpatient medical emergencies.
        Crit Care Med. 2015; 43: 1233-1238