Advertisement
Advanced Search
Article in Press

To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.

Abstract

Context

Routine biological tests are frequently ordered in self-poisoning patients, but their clinical relevance is poorly studied.

Material and methods

Prospective multicentric observational study, Emergency departments and intensive care units in five university and non-university French hospitals. Adult self-poisoning patients without severely altered vital status on admission were prospectively included.

Results

Routine biological test (serum electrolytes and creatinine, liver enzymes, bilirubin, blood cell count, prothrombin time) ordering and results were analyzed. 1027 patients were enrolled (age 40.2 ± 14 years, women 61.5%), no patient died during the hospital stay. Benzodiazepine were suspected in >70% of cases; 65% (range 48% - 80%) of patients had at least one routine biological test performed. At least one abnormal test was registered in 23% of these patients. Three factors were associated with abnormal test results: age> 40 years, male sex, and poisoning with a drug known to alter routine tests (i.e. acetaminophen, NSAIDs, metformine, lithium). Depending on these factors, abnormal results ranged from 14% to 48%. Unexpected severe life threatening conditions were recorded in 6 patients. Only, three patients were referred to the intensive care unit solely because of abnormal test results.

Conclusion

Routine biological tests are commonly prescribed in non-severe self-poisoning patients. Abnormal results are frequent but their relevance at bedside remains limited.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Log In


Forgot password?

Register

Create a new account

Purchase access to this article

Claim Access

If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.

Subscribe to this title

Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.

Institutional Access

Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

This work was financially supported by institutional funding: Angers University, Angers and Angers University Hospital, Angers, France

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

The work was performed in five french center: Angers University Hospital, Brest University Hospital, Cochin University Hospital (Paris), Le Mans Hospital and Saint Malo Hospital, France.

Related Articles

Searching for related articles..

Advertisement