Intraosseous access in the obese patient: assessing the need for extended needle length



      Intraosseous (IO) access can be complicated by obesity. Successful placement of a 25 mm IO needle is unlikely when soft tissue depth exceeds 20 mm.


      The authors examined the relationship between body mass index (BMI), the ability to palpate the tibial tuberosity (TT), and soft tissue depth at recommended IO insertion sites.


      Obese emergency department patients were assessed for a palpable TT and received ultrasound measurement of the soft tissue depth at recommended IO insertion sites. Linear and logistic regression were used to determine cut-off BMI values predicting soft tissue depth >20 mm.


      Seventy-five patients were enrolled with a mean BMI of 47.2. The mean soft tissue depth at the proximal humerus, proximal tibial, and distal tibial were 29.6 [95% CI 27.5-31.7] mm, 11.0 [8.9-13.0] mm, and 10.7 [9.4-12.1] mm, respectively. In 5 patients without a palpable TT the soft tissue depth exceeded 20 mm at all three anatomic sites. A BMI ≥43 and BMI ≥60 predicted a soft tissue depth >20 mm at the proximal tibia and distal tibia, respectively, while no reliable BMI cut-off was identified at the proximal humerus.


      In obese adults with a palpable TT or BMI ≤43 a 25 mm IO needle is likely adequate at the proximal and distal tibial insertion sites. Empiric use of an extended 45 mm IO needle is advisable at the proximal humeral insertion site in obese patients.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Santos D
        • Carron PN
        • Yersin B
        • Pasquier M
        EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: a prospective study and review of the literature.
        Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 440-445
        • Anson JA
        Vascular access in resuscitation: is there a role for the intraosseous route?.
        Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 1015-1031
        • Leidel BA
        • Kirchhoff C
        • Bogner V
        • Braunstein V
        • Biberthaler P
        • Kanz KG
        Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins.
        Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 40-45
        • Leidel BA
        • Kirchoff C
        • Bogner V
        • Stegmaier J
        • Mutschler W
        • Kanz KG
        • et al.
        Is the intraosseous access route fast and efficacious compared to conventional central venous catheterization in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department? A prospective observational pilot study.
        Patient Saf Surg. 2009; 3: 24
        • Paxton JH
        • Knuth TE
        • Klausner HA
        Proximal humerus intraosseous infusion: a preferred emergency venous access.
        J Trauma. 2009; 67: 606-611
        • Dolister M
        • Miller S
        • Borron S
        • Truemper E
        • Shah M
        • Lanford MR
        • et al.
        Intraosseous vascular access is safe, effective and costs less than central venous catheters for patients in the hospital setting.
        J Vasc Access. 2013; 14: 216-224
        • Flegal KM
        • Carroll MD
        • Ogden CL
        • Curtin LR
        Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 491-497
        • Sebbane M
        • Claret PG
        • Lefebvre S
        • Mercier G
        • Rubenovitch J
        • Jreige R
        • et al.
        Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility.
        J Emerg Med. 2013; 44: 299-305
        • Wampler D
        • Schwartz D
        • Shumaker J
        • Bolleter S
        • Beckett R
        • Manifold C
        Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 1095-1099
        • Vidacare Corporation Science & Clinical Department
        The science & fundamentals of intraosseous vascular access.
        2nd ed. 2013: 7-10
        • Moen TC
        • Sarwark JF
        Compartment syndrome following intraosseous infusion.
        Orthopedics. 2008; 31: 815
        • Ribeiro JA
        • Price CT
        • Knapp Jr., DR
        Compartment syndrome of the lower extremity after intraosseous infusion of fluid. A report of two cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 430-433
        • Launay F
        • Paut O
        • Katchburian M
        • Bourelle S
        • Jouve JL
        • Bollini G
        Leg amputation after intraosseous infusion in a 7-month-old infant: a case report.
        J Trauma. 2003; 55: 788-790
        • Lairet J.
        • Bebarta V.
        • Lairet K.
        • et al.
        A comparison of proximal tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17: 280-284
        • Pasley J.
        • Miller C.H.
        • DuBose J.J.
        • et al.
        Intraosseous infusion rates under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78: 295-299
        • Tan BK
        • Chong S
        • Koh ZX
        • Ong ME
        EZ-IO in the ED: an observational, prospective study comparing flow rates with proximal and distal tibia intraosseous access in adults.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 1602-1606
        • Reades R
        • Studnek JR
        • Vandeventer S
        • Garrett J
        Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 58: 509-516
        • Reades R
        • Studnek JR
        • Garrett JS
        • Vandeventer S
        • Blackwell T
        Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011; 15: 278-281