Low-dose (2-mSv) computed tomography for suspected appendicitis: Applicability in an emergency department

Published:March 14, 2018DOI:



      To document the level of interobserver agreement and compare the diagnostic performances of emergency physicians and radiologists at interpreting low radiation CT images of acute appendicitis in adolescents and young adults.


      One hundred and seven adolescents and young adult patients (aged 15 to 44 years) that underwent 2-mSv low-dose CT for suspected acute appendicitis between June and December in 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Three emergency physicians and three radiologists with different experiences of low-dose CT independently reviewed CT images. These six physicians rated the likelihood of acute appendicitis using a 5-point Likert scale. We calculated interobserver agreement and compared the diagnostic performances between emergency physicians and radiologists. And diagnostic confidence was also assessed using the likelihood of acute appendicitis.


      Acute appendicitis was pathologically confirmed in 42 patients (39%); the remaining 65 patients were considered not to have appendicitis. Fleiss' Kappa for reliability of agreement between emergency physicians and radiologists for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 0.720 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.685–0.726). Pooled areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for a diagnosis of appendicitis were 0.904 and 0.944 for emergency physicians and radiologists, respectively, and these AUC values were not significantly different (95% confidence interval, −0.087, 0.007; p = 0.0855).


      The emergency physicians and radiologists showed good interobserver agreement and comparable diagnostic performances for appendicitis in adolescents and adults using low-dose CT images. Low-dose CT could be a useful tool for the diagnosis of appendicitis by emergency physicians.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Deak P.D.
        • Smal Y.
        • Kalender W.A.
        Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.
        Radiology. 2010; 257: 158-166
        • Kim K.
        • Kim Y.H.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Kim S.
        • Lee Y.J.
        • Kim K.P.
        • et al.
        Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1596-1605
        • Coursey C.A.
        • Nelson R.C.
        • Patel M.B.
        • Cochran C.
        • Dodd L.G.
        • Delong D.M.
        • et al.
        Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study.
        Radiology. 2010; 254: 460-468
        • Fingar K.R.
        • Stocks C.
        • Weiss A.J.
        • Steiner C.A.
        Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012: statistical brief #186.
        in: Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs. edn. Rockville (MD). 2006
        • Raja A.S.
        • Wright C.
        • Sodickson A.D.
        • Zane R.D.
        • Schiff G.D.
        • Hanson R.
        • et al.
        Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
        Radiology. 2010; 256: 460-465
        • Fingar K.R.S.C.
        • Weiss A.J.
        • Steiner C.A.
        Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012: statistical brief #186. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs.
        Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD)2006
        • Drake F.T.
        • Florence M.G.
        • Johnson M.G.
        • Jurkovich G.J.
        • Kwon S.
        • Schmidt Z.
        • et al.
        Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's surgical care and outcomes assessment program.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 586-594
        • Park J.H.
        Diagnostic imaging utilization in cases of acute appendicitis: multi-center experience.
        J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29: 1308-1316
        • Brenner D.J.
        • Hall E.J.
        Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2277-2284
        • 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
        Ann ICRP. 1991; 21: 1-201
        • Korner H.
        • Sondenaa K.
        • Soreide J.A.
        • Andersen E.
        • Nysted A.
        • Lende T.H.
        • et al.
        Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis.
        World J Surg. 1997; 21: 313-317
        • Keyzer C.
        • Cullus P.
        • Tack D.
        • De Maertelaer V.
        • Bohy P.
        • Gevenois P.A.
        MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 1272-1281
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Lee K.H.
        • Kim K.
        • Kim T.Y.
        • Lee H.S.
        • Hwang S.S.
        • et al.
        Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.
        Radiology. 2011; 260: 437-445
        • Seo H.
        • Lee K.H.
        • Kim H.J.
        • Kim K.
        • Kang S.B.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 96-105
        • LOCAT group
        Low-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents and young adults (LOCAT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
        Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2: 793-804
        • Ahn S.
        LOCAT (low-dose computed tomography for appendicitis trial) comparing clinical outcomes following low- vs standard-dose computed tomography as the first-line imaging test in adolescents and young adults with suspected acute appendicitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
        Trials. 2014; 15: 28
        • Soni N.K.C.N.
        MDCT physics: the basics—technology, image quality and radiation dose.
        1st ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2009
        • Rosai J.A.L.
        in: Rosai J. Rosai and Ackerman's surgical pathology. 10th ed. Mosby, St. Louis2011
        • Gallas B.D.
        One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
        Acad Radiol. 2006; 13: 353-362
        • Obuchowski N.A.
        • Gallas B.D.
        • Hillis S.L.
        Multi-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.
        Acad Radiol. 2012; 19: 1508-1517
        • Hillis S.L.
        • Berbaum K.S.
        • Metz C.E.
        Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis.
        Acad Radiol. 2008; 15: 647-661
        • Skaron A.
        • Li K.
        • Zhou X.H.
        Statistical methods for MRMC ROC studies.
        Acad Radiol. 2012; 19: 1499-1507
        • Daly C.P.
        • Cohan R.H.
        • Francis I.R.
        • Caoili E.M.
        • Ellis J.H.
        • Nan B.
        Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1813-1820
        • Lee Y.J.
        • Kim B.
        • Ko Y.
        • Cho K.E.
        • Hong S.S.
        • Kim D.H.
        • et al.
        Low-dose (2-mSv) CT in adolescents and young adults with suspected appendicitis: advantages of additional review of thin sections using multiplanar sliding-slab averaging technique.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 485-491
        • Park J.H.
        • Kim B.
        • Kim M.S.
        • Kim H.J.
        • Ko Y.
        • Ahn S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in diagnosing appendicitis at 2-mSv CT.
        Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016; 41: 1227-1236
        • Holdgate A.
        • Chan T.
        How accurate are emergency clinicians at interpreting noncontrast computed tomography for suspected renal colic?.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 315-319
        • Limon O.
        • Oray D.
        • Ertan C.
        • Sahin E.
        • Ugurhan A.A.
        Recognizing acute appendicitis criteria on abdominal CT: do emergency physicians need a preliminary report?.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33: 1002-1005
        • Ahn S.
        • Park S.H.
        • Lee K.H.
        How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research.
        Radiology. 2013; 267: 328-338