Impact of a low intensity and broadly inclusive ED care coordination intervention on linkage to primary care and ED utilization

Published:April 05, 2018DOI:



      We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a broadly inclusive, comparatively low intensity intervention linking ED patients to a primary care home.


      This retrospective cohort study evaluated ED patients referred for primary care linkage in a large, urban, academic ED. A care coordination specialist performed a brief interview to gauge access barriers and provide a clinic referral with optional scheduling assistance. Data were abstracted from program records and the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the proportion of referred individuals who attended at least one primary care appointment.
      Secondary outcomes included return ED encounters within one year, and factors associated with linkage outcomes.


      There were 2142 referrals made for 2064 patients; 1688/2142 accepted assistance. Linkage was successful for 1059/1688 (63%, CI95 60% to 65%). Among patients accepting assistance, those without successful linkage were younger (41 vs 45 years, difference 3 years, CI95 2 to 3), more often male (62% vs 55%,difference 7%, CI95 2% to 12%), and less likely to have a chronic medical condition (37% vs 45%, difference 8%; CI95 3% to 12%) or to have had an appointment scheduled within two weeks (26% vs 33%, difference 7%, CI95 2% to 12%). Insurance status and self-reported barriers to care were not associated with linkage success. Patterns of subsequent ED use were similar, regardless of referral status or linkage outcome.


      Low intensity, broadly inclusive, ED care coordination linked nearly 50% of patients referred for intervention, and two-thirds of willing participants, with a primary care home.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Cantlupe J.
        Volume, flow and safety issues in the ED.
        Health Leaders Media Council, 2012(May)
        • Cheung P.T.
        • Wiler J.L.
        • Ginde A.A.
        Changes in barriers to primary care and emergency department utilization.
        Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 1397-1398
        • Shaw E.K.
        • Howard J.
        • Clark E.C.
        • Etz R.S.
        • Arya R.
        • Tallia A.F.
        Decision-making processes of patients who use the emergency department for primary care needs.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013; 24: 1288-1305
        • Afilalo J.
        • Marinovich A.
        • Afilalo M.
        • et al.
        Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 1302-1310
        • Cheung P.T.
        • Wiler J.L.
        • Lowe R.A.
        • Ginde A.A.
        National study of barriers to timely primary care and emergency department utilization among medicaid beneficiaries.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60 ([e2]): 4-10
        • Baker L.C.
        • Baker L.S.
        Excess cost of emergency department visits for nonurgent care.
        Health Aff. 1994; 13: 162-171
        • Coventry J.A.
        • Weston M.S.
        • Collins P.M.
        Emergency room encounters of pediatric patients with asthma: cost comparisons with other treatment settings.
        J Ambul Care Manage. 1996; 19: 9-21
        • Mehrota A.
        • Liu H.
        • Adams J.L.
        • et al.
        Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 321-328
        • Carrier E.
        • Yee T.
        • Holzwart R.A.
        Coordination between emergency and primary care physicians. NIHCR.
        Res Briefs. 2011; 3: 1-11
        • Stiell A.
        • Forster A.J.
        • Stiell I.G.
        • van Walraven C.
        Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes.
        Can Med Assoc J. 2003; 169: 1023-1028
        • Bodenheimer T.
        Coordinating care: a perilous journey through the healthcare system.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1064-1071
      1. The fragmentation of US health care: causes and solutions. Oxford.
        in: Elhauge E. internal-pdf://2515134372/Harvard Elhauge the fragmentation of US Health.pdf. 2010
        • McDonald K.M.
        • Sundaram V.
        • Bravata D.M.
        • et al.
        Closing the gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies.
        . 2007; 7
        • Penm J.
        • MacKinnon N.J.
        • Strakowski S.M.
        • Ying J.
        • Doty M.M.
        Minding the gap: factors associated with primary care coordination of adults in 11 countries.
        Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15: 113-119
        • Katz E.B.
        • Carrier E.R.
        • Umscheid C.A.
        • Pines J.M.
        Comparative effectiveness of care coordination interventions in the emergency department: a systematic review.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60: 12-23
        • McCusker J.
        • Debdukuri N.
        • Tousignant P.
        • Verdon J.
        • Poulin de Courval L.
        • Belzile E.
        Rapid two-stage emergency department intervention for seniors: impact on continuity of care.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 233-243
        • Mion L.C.
        • Palmer R.M.
        • Meldon S.W.
        • et al.
        Case finding and referral model for emergency department elders: a randomized clinical trial.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 41: 57-68
        • Wong F.K.
        • Chow S.
        • Kea Chang
        Effects of nurse follow-up on emergency room revisits: a randomized controlled trial.
        Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59: 2207-2218
        • Zorc J.J.
        • Scarfone R.J.
        • Yea Li
        Scheduled follow-up after a pediatric emergency department visit for asthma: a randomized trial.
        Pediatrics. 2003; 111: 495-502
        • Horwitz S.M.
        • Busch S.H.
        • Balestracci K.M.
        • Ellingson K.D.
        • Rawlings J.
        Intensive intervention improves primary care follow-up for uninsured emergency department patients.
        Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 647-652
        • Chan T.C.
        • Killeen J.P.
        • Castillo E.M.
        • et al.
        Impact of an internet-based emergency department appointment system to access primary care at safety net community clinics.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54: 279-284
        • Wallis M.
        • Hooper J.
        • Kerr D.
        • Lind J.
        • Bost N.
        Effectiveness of an advanced practice emergency nurse role in a minor injuries unit.
        Aust J Adv Nurs. 2009; 27: 21-29
        • Kyriacou D.N.
        • Handel D.
        • Stein A.C.
        • Nelson R.R.
        Factors affecting outpatient follow-up compliance of emergency department patients.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20: 938-942
        • Magnasson A.R.
        • Hedges J.R.
        • Vanko M.
        • McCarten K.
        • Moorhead J.C.
        Follow-up compliance after emergency department evaluation.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 560-567
        • Vukmir R.B.
        • Kremen R.
        • Dehart D.A.
        • Menegazzi J.
        Compliance with emergency department patient referral.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1992; 10: 413-417
        • McMullen M.J.
        • Netland P.A.
        Lead time for appointment and the no-show rate in an ophthalmology clinic.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9: 513-516
        • Gallucci G.
        • Swartz W.
        Impact of the wait for an initial appointment on the rate of kept appointments at a mental health center.
        Psychiatr Serv. 2005; 56: 344-346
        • Weber E.J.
        • Showstack J.A.
        • Hunt K.A.
        • et al.
        Are the uninsured responsible for the increase in emergency department visits in the United States?.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2008; 52: 108-115
        • Blank F.S.
        • Li H.
        • Henneman P.L.
        • et al.
        A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2005; 31: 139-144
        • Sommers A.S.
        • Boukus E.R.
        • Carrier E.
        Dispelling myths about emergency department use: majority of medicaid visits are for urgent or more serious symptoms.
        Res Briefs. 2012; 23: 1-10
        • Fertel B.S.
        • Hart K.W.
        • Lindsell C.J.
        • Ryan R.J.
        • Lyons M.S.
        Patients who use multiple EDs: quantifying the degree of overlap between ED populations.
        West J Emerg Med. 2015; 16: 229-233
        • Gill J.M.
        • Mainous III, A.G.
        • Nsereko M.N.
        The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use.
        Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9: 333-338
        • Ionescu-Ittu R.
        • McCusker J.
        • Ciampi A.
        • et al.
        Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people.
        Can Med Assoc J. 2007; 177: 1362-1368