Advertisement

Ambulance transport to the emergency department: A patient-selected signal of acuity and its effect on resource provision

Published:August 29, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.068

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine whether ambulance arrival to the emergency department has remained an unidentified signal of perceived medical acuity. Informed by economic signaling theory, does arrival via ambulance affect resource utilization given varying levels of patient acuity?

      Methods

      The analysis examined a nationally representative sample of de-identified emergency department patient encounters from 2011 to 2015, gathered from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed using regional and time-fixed effects. The provision of twenty diagnostic and imaging services was analyzed. Patient encounters were also categorized into five acuity-levels.

      Results

      Drawing from the NHAMCS dataset, 98,888 emergency department records were analyzed, weighted to represent 504.5 million estimated emergency department patient encounters. Findings suggest that patients transported to the hospital via ambulance are more likely than those who arrive by other means to receive 19 of the 20 analyzed diagnostic testing and imaging services. Furthermore, when analyzed by acuity-level, the disparity of service provision is the greatest among low-acuity patients, where medical complaints are argued to be the most subjective.

      Conclusions

      The results are consistent with the notion that emergency department medical providers readily accept ambulance transport as a valid signal of patient acuity, regardless of true acuity level. Consequently, patients transported to the hospital via ambulance may be receiving a disproportionate amount of medical resources in an increasingly cost-conscious environment.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Spence M.
        Job Market Signaling.
        Q J Econ. 1973; 3: 355
        • Jacob S.
        • Jacoby J.
        • James R.
        • Heller M.
        Ambulance transport: why ED patients choose as they do.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48: S54
        • Durant E.
        • Fahimi J.
        Factors associated with ambulance use among patients with low-acuity conditions.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012; 16: 329-337
        • Marinovich A.
        • Afilalo J.
        • Afilalo M.
        • Colacone A.
        • Unger B.
        • Giguère C.
        • et al.
        Impact of ambulance transportation on resource use in the emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 312-315
        • Ruger J.P.
        • Richter C.J.
        • Lewis L.M.
        Clinical and economic factors associated with ambulance use to the emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 879-885
        • Pearson C.
        • Kim D.
        • Mango L.
        • Compton S.
        • Levy P.
        124: Factors associated with ambulance use for low acuity conditions in an urban emergency department.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56: S42
        • West B.T.
        • Berglund P.
        • Heeringa S.G.
        A closer examination of subpopulation analysis of complex-sample survey data.
        Stata J. 2008; 8: 520-531
        • Gilboy N.
        • Tanabe P.
        • Travers D.
        • Rosenau A.
        Emergency Severity Index (ESI): a triage tool for emergency department care.
        in: Version 4: Implementation Handbook. 2012 ed. Rockville, MD2011
        • Robinson J.C.
        Hospital quality competition and the economics of imperfect information.
        Milbank Q. 1988; : 465
        • Choongsup Lee E.M.
        Optimal medical treatment under asymmetric information.
        J Health Econ. 1995; 14: 419-441
        • Schneider U.
        Asymmetric information and the demand for health care–the case of double moral hazard.
        Schmollers Jahrbuch J Appl Soc Sci Stud. 2004; 124: 233-256
        • Jae-Young L.
        The effect of patient's asymmetric information problem on elderly use of medical care.
        Appl Econ. 2007; 39: 2133-2142
        • Schneider U.
        • Volker U.
        The physician-patient relationship revisited: the patient's view.
        Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008; 8: 279
        • Friehe T.
        Screening accident victims.
        Int Rev Law Econ. 2009; 29: 272-280
        • Lim J.-Y.
        • Jo C.
        The effect of patient's asymmetric information problem on medical care utilization with consideration of a patient's ex-ante health status.
        Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics. 2009; 50: 143-164
        • Wang J.-Y.
        • Probst J.C.
        • Stoskopf C.H.
        • Sanders J.M.
        • McTigue J.F.
        Information asymmetry and performance tilting in hospitals: a National Empirical Study.
        Health Econ. 2011; 20: 1487-1506
        • Mascarenhas O.A.J.
        • Kellsteadt C.
        • Kesavan R.
        • Bernacchi M.D.
        Information asymmetry in U. S. Healthcare System.
        in: Proceedings of the Business, Society & Government Consortium of the Midwest Business Administration Association. 2012: 84-112
        • Arrow K.J.
        Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care.
        Am Econ Rev. 1963; 53: 941-973
        • Grytten J.
        • Sorensen R.
        Type of contract and supplier-induced demand for primary physicians in Norway.
        J Health Econ. 2001; 20: 379-393
        • Chou S.-Y.
        Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes.
        J Health Econ. 2002; 21: 293-311
        • Fiscella K.
        • Franks P.
        • Zwanziger J.
        • Mooney C.
        • Sorbero M.
        • Williams G.C.
        Risk aversion and costs: a comparison of family physicians and general internists.
        J Fam Pract. 2000; 49: 12-17
        • Katz D.A.
        • Williams G.C.
        • Brown R.L.
        • Aufderheide T.P.
        • Bogner M.
        • Rahko P.S.
        • et al.
        Emergency physicians' fear of malpractice in evaluating patients with possible acute cardiac ischemia.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46: 525-533
        • Tubbs E.P.
        • Elrod J.A.B.
        • Flum D.R.
        Risk taking and tolerance of uncertainty: implications for surgeons.
        J Surg Res. 2006; 131: 1-6
        • Coricelli G.
        The potential role of regret in the physician-patient relationship: insights from Neuroeconomics.
        Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008; 20: 85-97
        • Gibson G.
        Measures of emergency ambulance effectiveness: unmet need and inappropriate use.
        JACEP. 1977; 6: 389-392
        • Rademaker A.W.
        • Powell D.G.
        • Read J.H.
        Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and nonparamedic ambulance systems.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16: 553-556
        • Gardner G.J.
        The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance.
        Arch Emerg Med. 1990; 7: 81-89
        • Billittier A.J.
        • Moscati R.
        • Janicke D.
        • Lerner E.B.
        • Seymour J.
        • Olsson D.
        A multisite survey of factors contributing to medically unnecessary ambulance transports.
        Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3: 1046-1052
        • Gratton M.
        • Ellison S.
        • Hunt J.
        • Ma O.
        Prospective determination of medical necessity for ambulance transport by paramedics.
        Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003; 7: 466-469
        • Patton G.G.
        • Thakore S.
        Reducing inappropriate emergency department attendances–a review of ambulance service attendances at a regional teaching hospital in Scotland.
        Emerg Med J. 2013; 30: 459-461
        • Spiro D.
        • Heidrich F.
        Lay understanding of medical terminology.
        J Fam Pract. 1983; 17: 277-279
        • Hinson J.S.
        • Martinez D.A.
        • Schmitz P.S.
        • Toerper M.
        • Radu D.
        • Scheulen J.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of emergency department triage using the emergency severity index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: a retrospective cohort analysis.
        Int J Emerg Med. 2018; 11: 3
        • Platts-Mills T.F.
        • Travers D.
        • Biese K.
        • McCall B.
        • Kizer S.
        • LaMantia M.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of the emergency severity index triage instrument for identifying elder emergency department patients receiving an immediate life-saving intervention.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17: 238-243
        • Martin A.
        • Davidson C.L.
        • Panik A.
        • Buckenmyer C.
        • Delpais P.
        • Ortiz M.
        An examination of ESI triage scoring accuracy in relationship to ED nursing attitudes and experience.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2014; 40: 461-468
        • Cooper R.J.
        NHAMCS: does it hold up to scrutiny?.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60: 722-725
        • McCaig L.F.
        • Burt C.W.
        Understanding and interpreting the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: key questions and answers.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60: 716-721
        • McMullen M.E.
        • Pines J.M.
        Assessing severity, immediacy, and ideal setting in ED patients: a pilot study on Interrater reliability.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 1276-1280
        • Gill J.M.
        • Riley A.W.
        Nonurgent use of hospital emergency departments: urgency from the patient's perspective.
        J Fam Pract. 1996; 42: 491-496