The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [
[1]
] and its implementation into institutional protocols for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary
resuscitation (ECPR) is rapidly increasing [
1
,
2
,
3
]. One of the commonly reported contraindications to veno-arterial ECMO is acute aortic
dissection, although no studies on feasibility, safety and efficacy of ECPR in this
condition exist. In this context we read with great interest the report of Kelly et
al. in the Journal [
[4]
]. While we fully agree that transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is still underutilized
especially in emergency medicine and intensive care, the decision against veno-arterial
ECMO upon identification of acute aortic dissection Type A (AADA) raised some concerns
to us.Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency MedicineAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Extracorporeal life support organization registry international report 2016.ASAIO J. 2017; 63: 60-67
- Descriptive analysis of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-an ELSO registry study.Resuscitation. 2017; 119: 56-62
- ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock.Herz. 2017; 42: 27-44
- Transesophageal echocardiography identification of aortic dissection during cardiac arrest and cessation of ECMO initiation.Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37: 1214.e5-1214.e6
- Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63-81
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014; 20: 259-265
- Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR): consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC.Clin Res Cardiol. 2018; (Epub ahead of print)
- Non-traumatic aortic dissection or rupture as cause of cardiac arrest: presentation and outcome.Resuscitation. 2004; 60: 143-150
- Angiographic detection of fatal acute aortic dissection Stanford type A under resuscitation.Cardiol J. 2016; 23: 620-622
- Prevalence of type A acute aortic dissection in patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117: 1826-1830
- Echocardiography in the emergency assessment of acute aortic syndromes.Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10: i31-i39
- Echocardiographic findings mimicking type A aortic dissection.Herz. 2006; 31: 153-155
- Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults.Clin Res Cardiol. 2016; 105: 283-296
- Treatment of a patient with acute aortic dissection using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a case report.Acute Med Surg. 2018; 5: 189-193
- Effectiveness and limitations of emergency extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support.J Jpn Soc Intensive Care Med. 2009; 16: 309-310
- Detection of false lumen perfusion at the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing repair of aortic dissection.Crit Care Med. 2000; 28: 1841-1846
- Femoral cannulation is safe for type A dissection repair.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 78 ([discussion 1285-9]): 1285-1289
- Femoral artery cannulation in Stanford type A aortic dissection operations.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2006; 14: 35-37
- Comparison of ascending aorta versus femoral artery cannulation for acute aortic dissection type A.Circulation. 2009; 120: S282-S286
- Mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A: analysis of pre- and intraoperative risk factors from the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA).Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49: e44-e52
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: April 22, 2019
Accepted:
April 22,
2019
Received:
March 25,
2019
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.