Advertisement

Pulse oximeter plethysmograph waveform and automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer for ankle-brachial index measurement

Published:October 27, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.042

      Abstract

      Objectives

      There are limited non-invasive methods to assess lower extremity arterial injuries in the emergency department (ED) and pre-hospital setting. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) requires careful auscultation by Doppler, an approach made difficult in noisy environments. We sought to determine the agreement of the ABI measured using the pulse oximeter plethysmograph waveform (Pleth) with auscultation by Doppler in a controlled setting. A secondary outcome sought to examine the agreement of ABI by automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer (AOS) with Doppler.

      Methods

      We measured blood pressure in the right upper and lower extremities of healthy volunteers using: (1) Doppler and manual sphygmomanometer; (2) Pleth and manual sphygmomanometer; and (3) AOS. The Bland-Altman approach to assessing agreement between methods was used comparing mean differences between ABI pairs to their means for Doppler versus Pleth and Doppler versus AOS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects models examined intra- and inter-rater reliability.

      Results

      Among 100 participants with normal ABI the mean ABI (95%CI) were Doppler 1.11 (0.90–1.33), Pleth 1.10 (0.91–1.30), and AOS 1.10 (0.90–1.30). The ABI difference (95% CI for limits of agreement) were 0.01 (−0.20,0.18) for Doppler-Pleth and 0.02 (−0.26, 0.22) for Doppler-AOS. The ICC for the Doppler-Pleth comparison (ICC = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47–0.63) was greater than for the Doppler-AOS (ICC = 0.32, 95% CI 0.19–0.43).

      Conclusions

      The ABI measured using the Pleth has a high level of agreement with measurement by Doppler. The AOS and Doppler have good agreement with greater measurement variability. Pleth and AOS may be reasonable alternatives to Doppler for ABI.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Uccioli L.
        • Meloni M.
        • Izzo V.
        • Giurato L.
        • Merolla S.
        • Gandini R.
        Critical limb ischemia: current challenges and future prospects.
        Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018; 14: 63-74
        • Dorlac W.C.
        • DeBakey M.E.
        • Holcomb J.B.
        • et al.
        Mortality from isolated civilian penetrating extremity injury.
        J Trauma. 2005; 59: 217-222
        • Kauvar D.S.
        • Sarfati M.R.
        • Kraiss L.W.
        National trauma databank analysis of mortality and limb loss in isolated lower extremity vascular trauma.
        J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53: 1598-1603
        • Colip C.G.
        • Gorantla V.
        • LeBedis C.A.
        • Soto J.A.
        • Anderson S.W.
        Extremity CTA for penetrating trauma: 10-year experience using a 64-detector row CT scanner.
        Emerg Radiol. 2017; 24: 223-232
        • Aboyans V.
        • Criqui M.H.
        • Abraham P.
        • et al.
        Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2012; 126: 2890-2909
        • de Souza I.S.
        • Benabbas R.
        • McKee S.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of physical examination, ankle-brachial index, and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of arterial injury in patients with penetrating extremity trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24 (doi: 10.111/acem.13227): 994-1017
        • Wisely N.A.
        • Cook L.B.
        Arterial flow waveforms from pulse oximetry compared with measured Doppler flow waveforms apparatus.
        Anaesthesia. 2001; 56: 556-561
        • Cannesson M.
        • Besnard C.
        • Durand P.G.
        • Bohe J.
        • Jacques D.
        Relation between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in ventilated patients.
        Crit Care. 2005; 9 ([Epub 2005 Aug 23]): R562-R568https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3799
        • Gilmore B.
        • Hardwick W.
        • Noland J.
        • Patton D.
        Determination of systolic blood pressure via pulse oximeter in transported pediatric patients.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999; 15: 183-186
        • Allen J.
        • Overbeck K.
        • Nath A.F.
        • Murray A.
        • Stansby G.
        A prospective comparison of bilateral photoplethysmography versus the ankle-brachial pressure index for detecting and quantifying lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
        J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47: 794-802https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.057
        • Jönsson B.
        • Laurent C.
        • Eneling M.
        • Skau T.
        • Lindberg L.G.
        Automatic ankle pressure measurements using PPG in ankle-brachial pressure index determination.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005; 30: 395-401https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.012
        • Khandanpour N.
        • Armon M.P.
        • Jennings B.
        • Clark A.
        • Meyer F.J.
        Photoplethysmography, an easy and accurate method for measuring ankle brachial pressure index: can photoplethysmography replace Doppler?.
        Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009; 43 ([Epub 2009 Jul 29]): 578-582https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574409334829
        • Harris P.A.
        • Taylor R.
        • Thielke R.
        • Payne J.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Conde J.G.
        Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.
        Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-160
        • Chen G.
        • Taylor P.A.
        • Haller S.P.
        • et al.
        Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.
        Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39 ([doi: 10.002/hbm.23909. Epub 2017 Dec 7]): 1187-1206
        • Parker R.A.
        • Weir C.J.
        • Rubio N.
        • et al.
        Application of mixed effects limits of agreement in the presence of multiple sources of variability: exemplar from the comparison of several devices to measure respiratory rate in COPD patients.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11 ([eCollection 2016])e0168321https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone
        • Van der Elst W.
        • Molenberghs G.
        • Hilgers R.D.
        • Verbeke G.
        • Heussen N.
        Estimating the reliability of repeatedly measured endpoints based on linear mixed-effects models. A tutorial.
        Pharm Stat. 2016; 15 ([Epub 2016 Sep 29]): 486-493https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.787
        • Bürkner P.-C.
        Advanced bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms.
        R J. 2018; 10: 395-411
        • Koo T.K.
        • Li M.Y.
        A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub Mar 31
        • Abu Dabrh A.M.
        • Steffen M.W.
        • Undavalli C.
        • et al.
        The natural history of untreated severe or critical limb ischemia.
        J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62 (1642-51.e3)