Advertisement

Motor vehicle-related electric scooter injuries in the US: A descriptive analysis of NEISS data

  • Lucas M. Neuroth
    Affiliations
    The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA

    Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kayleigh D. Humphries
    Affiliations
    The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jeffrey J. Wing
    Affiliations
    Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gary A. Smith
    Affiliations
    The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA

    Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370W. 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Motao Zhu
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, RB3-WB5217, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
    Affiliations
    The Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA

    Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

    Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 370W. 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:February 26, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.004

      Abstract

      Introduction

      The introduction of scooter-share programs across the United States has led to an increased incidence of electronic scooter (e-scooter) injuries presenting to emergency departments (EDs). As legislation begins to push scooters from the sidewalk to the street, injuries resulting from collisions between e-scooters and motor vehicles are an important, but poorly characterized consideration. This study leverages data from a national injury surveillance system to characterize e-scooter versus motor vehicle collisions resulting in ED presentation.

      Methods

      This study utilizes data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). NEISS was queried for e-scooter-related injuries from January 1st, 2015 through December 31st, 2019. Injuries were characterized as motor vehicle-related (MV-involved) or non-motor-vehicle-related (MV-uninvolved) based on a manual review by the study investigators. Weighted tabular analyses were used to characterize both types of e-scooter injuries across demographic, diagnostic, and event-related factors.

      Results

      Over the study period an estimated 60,554 (95% CI: 37,525-84,594) injuries were treated in US EDs. Approximately 19% of these injuries involved motor vehicles. Those sustaining MV-involved injuries were significantly younger (p = 0.01), with a higher proportion of males injured (p = 0.01). Additionally, when compared to MV-uninvolved injuries, a significantly higher proportion of those with MV-involved injuries were admitted to the hospital for treatment (8.8% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.01). MV-involved injuries occurred primarily in the street (96.3%), while MV-uninvolved injuries were split across streets (44.0%), at one's home (~20%), and on public property (~20%) (p < 0.01).

      Conclusions

      Electric scooter injuries involving a motor vehicle differed from those that did not across several key categories. As e-scooters and motor vehicles start to share the road more frequently, greater consideration should be made regarding how these two modes of transportation interact with each other. The promotion of thoughtful e-scooter legislation and infrastructure changes could help promote safer travel.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D; use, select 'Corporate R&D; Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • National Association of City Transportation Officials
        Shared Micromobility in the US: 2018.
        2019
        • Shaheen S.
        • Cohen A.
        Shared Micromoblity policy toolkit: Docked and Dockless bike and scooter sharing.
        Transportation Sustainability Research Center, UC Berkeley2019
        • DuPuis N.
        • Griess J.
        • Klein C.
        Micromobility in cities: a history and policy overview.
        National Association of City Transportation Officials, 2019
        • Mayhew L.J.
        • Bergin C.
        Impact of e-scooter injuries on emergency department imaging.
        J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019; 63: 461-466https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12889
        • Bekhit M.N.Z.
        • Le Fevre J.
        • Bergin C.J.
        Regional healthcare costs and burden of injury associated with electric scooters.
        Injury. 2020; 51: 271-277https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.026
        • Brownson A.B.
        • Fagan P.V.
        • Dickson S.
        • Civil I.D.
        Electric scooter injuries at Auckland City Hospital.
        N Z Med J. 2019; 132: 62-72
        • Mitchell G.
        • Tsao H.
        • Randell T.
        • Marks J.
        • Mackay P.
        Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme.
        Emerg Med Australas. 2019; 31: 930-934https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13356
        • Blomberg S.N.F.
        • Rosenkrantz O.C.M.
        • Lippert F.
        • Collatz Christensen H.
        Injury from electric scooters in Copenhagen: a retrospective cohort study.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e033988https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033988
        • Liew Y.K.
        • Wee C.P.J.
        • Pek J.H.
        New peril on our roads: a retrospective study of electric scooter-related injuries.
        Singapore Med J. 2020; 61: 92-95https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019083
        • DiMaggio C.J.
        • Bukur M.
        • Wall S.P.
        • Frangos S.G.
        • Wen A.Y.
        Injuries associated with electric-powered bikes and scooters: analysis of US consumer product data.
        Inj Prev. 2019; (injuryprev-2019-043418)https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043418
        • Aizpuru M.
        • Farley K.X.
        • Rojas J.C.
        • Crawford R.S.
        • Moore T.J.
        • Wagner E.R.
        Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares: a review of the national electronic surveillance system.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37: 1133-1138https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.049
        • Bresler A.Y.
        • Hanba C.
        • Svider P.
        • Carron M.A.
        • Hsueh W.D.
        • Paskhover B.
        Craniofacial injuries related to motorized scooter use: a rising epidemic.
        Am J Otolaryngol. 2019; 40: 662-666https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.05.023
        • Namiri N.K.
        • Lui H.
        • Tangney T.
        • Allen I.E.
        • Cohen A.J.
        • Breyer B.N.
        Electric scooter injuries and hospital admissions in the United States, 2014-2018.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 357-359https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5423
        • Farley K.X.
        • Aizpuru M.
        • Wilson J.M.
        • Daly C.A.
        • Xerogeanes J.
        • Gottschalk M.B.
        • et al.
        Estimated incidence of electric scooter injuries in the US from 2014 to 2019.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e2014500-ehttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14500
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Austin Public Health
        Dockless electric scooter-related injuries study.
        2019
        • Trivedi T.K.
        • Liu C.
        • Antonio A.L.M.
        • Wheaton N.
        • Kreger V.
        • Yap A.
        • et al.
        Injuries associated with standing electric scooter use.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2e187381-ehttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381
        • Lavoie-Gagne O.
        • Siow M.
        • Harkin W.
        • Flores A.R.
        • Girard P.J.
        • Schwartz A.K.
        • et al.
        Characterization of electric scooter injuries over 27 months at an urban level 1 trauma center.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2021; 45: 129-136https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.019
        • Cicchino J.B.
        • Kulie P.E.
        • McCarthy M.L.
        Severity of e-scooter rider injuries associated with trip characteristics.
        J Safety Res. 2021; 76: 256-261https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.016
        • Shah N.R.
        • Aryal S.
        • Wen Y.
        • Cherry C.R.
        Comparison of motor vehicle-involved e-scooter and bicycle crashes using standardized crash typology.
        J Safety Res. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.005
        • Schroeder T.
        • Ault K.
        The NEISS sample (design and implementation) 1997 to present.
        United States Consumer Product Safety Comission, 2001
        • Consumer Product Safety Comission
        NEISS coding manual January 2019.
        2019
        • Rao J.N.K.
        • Thomas D.R.
        Chi-squared tests for contingency tables.
        in: Skinner C.J. Holt D. TMF Smith Analysis of complex surveys. Wiley, 1989: 89-114
        • Rao J.N.K.
        • Scott A.J.
        On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data.
        Ann Stat. 1984; 12: 46-60
        • Rao J.N.K.
        • Scott A.J.
        On simple adjustments to Chi-Square tests with sample survey data.
        Ann Stat. 1987; 15: 385-397
        • National Association of City Transportation Officials
        Shared micromobility in the U.S.: 2019.
        2020
        • Qiu L.
        • Nixon W.A.
        Effects of adverse weather on traffic crashes.
        Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2008; 2055: 139-146https://doi.org/10.3141/2055-16
        • Saha S.
        • Schramm P.
        • Nolan A.
        • Hess J.
        Adverse weather conditions and fatal motor vehicle crashes in the United States, 1994–2012.
        Environ Health. 2016; 15https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0189-x
        • Brainard B.J.
        • Slauterbeck J.
        • Benjamin J.B.
        • Hagaman R.M.
        • Higie S.
        Injury profiles in pedestrian motor vehicle trauma.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18: 881-883https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80218-5
        • Lusk A.C.
        • Furth P.G.
        • Morency P.
        • Miranda-Moreno L.F.
        • Willett W.C.
        • Dennerlein J.T.
        Risk of injury for bicycling on cycle tracks versus in the street.
        Inj Prev. 2011; 17: 131-135https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.028696
        • Cohen E.
        Segregated bike lanes are safest for cyclists.
        CMAJ. 2013; 185: E443-E444https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4468
        • Harris M.A.
        • Reynolds C.C.O.
        • Winters M.
        • Cripton P.A.
        • Shen H.
        • Chipman M.L.
        • et al.
        Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design.
        Inj Prev. 2013; 19: 303-310
        • Consumer Product Safety Commision
        Explanation of NEISS estimates obtained through the CPSC website.