Advertisement

First medical contact and physicians' opinion after the implementation of an electronic record system

Published:October 26, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.014

      Abstract

      Hospitals implement electronic medical record systems (EMRSs) that are intended to support medical and nursing staff in their daily work. Evolution toward more computerization seems inescapable. Nevertheless, this evolution introduced new problems of organization.
      This before-and-after observational study evaluated the door-to-first-medical-contact (FMC) times before and after the introduction of EMRS. A satisfaction questionnaire, administered after the “after” period, measured clinicians' satisfaction concerning computerization in routine clinical use. The following 5 questions were asked: Do you spare time in your note taking with EMRS? Do you spare time in the medical care that you provide to the patients with EMRS? Does EMRS improve the quality of medical care for your patients? Are you satisfied with the EMRS implementation? Would you prefer a return to handwritten records?
      Results showed an increase in door-to-FMC time induced by EMRS and a lower triage capacity. In the satisfaction questionnaire, clinicians reported minimal satisfaction but refused to return to handwritten records.
      The increase in door-to-FMC time may be explained by the improved quantity/quality of data and by the many interruptions due to the software. Medical reorganization was requested after the installation of the EMRS.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jha A.K.
        • DesRoches C.M.
        • Campbell E.G.
        • Donelan K.
        • Rao S.R.
        • Ferris T.G.
        • et al.
        Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1628-1638
        • Feied C.F.
        • Smith M.S.
        • Handler J.A.
        • Kanhouwa M.
        Emergency medicine can play a leadership role in enterprise-wide clinical information systems.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35: 162-167
        • Dinh M.
        • Chu M.
        Evolution of health information management and information technology in emergency medicine.
        Emerg Med Australas. 2006; 18: 289-294
        • Lee F.C.
        • Chong W.F.
        • Chong P.
        • Ooi S.B.
        The emergency medicine department system: a study of the effects of computerization on the quality of medical records.
        Eur J Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 107-115
        • Dexter P.R.
        • Perkins S.
        • Overhage J.M.
        • Maharry K.
        • Kohler R.B.
        • McDonald C.J.
        A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 965-970
        • DesRoches C.M.
        • Campbell E.G.
        • Rao S.R.
        • Donelan K.
        • Ferris T.G.
        • Jha A.
        • et al.
        Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 50-60
        • Garg A.X.
        • Adhikari N.K.
        • McDonald H.
        • Rosas-Arellano M.P.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Beyene J.
        • et al.
        Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 1223-1238
        • Ash J.S.
        • Sittig D.F.
        • Poon E.G.
        • Guappone K.
        • Campbell E.
        • Dykstra R.H.
        The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14: 415-423
        • Piasecki J.K.
        • Calhoun E.
        • Engelberg J.
        • Rice W.
        • Dilts D.
        • Belser D.
        • et al.
        Computerized provider order entry in the emergency department: pilot evaluation of a return on investment analysis instrument.
        AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005; : 1081
        • Likourezos A.
        • Chalfin D.B.
        • Murphy D.G.
        • Sommer B.
        • Darcy K.
        • Davidson S.J.
        Physician and nurse satisfaction with an electronic medical record system.
        J Emerg Med. 2004; 27: 419-424
        • Yen K.
        • Shane E.L.
        • Pawar S.S.
        • Schwendel N.D.
        • Zimmanck R.J.
        • Gorelick M.H.
        Time motion study in a pediatric emergency department before and after computer physician order entry.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 53: 462-468.e1
      1. Scribes, EMR please docs, save $600,000.
        ED Manag. 2009; 21: 117-118
        • Arya R.
        • Salovich D.M.
        • Ohman-Strickland P.
        • Merlin M.A.
        Impact of scribes on performance indicators in the emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17: 490-494
        • Jeanmonod R.
        • Boyd M.
        • Loewenthal M.
        • Triner W.
        The nature of emergency department interruptions and their impact on patient satisfaction.
        Emerg Med J. 2010; 27: 376-379
        • Westbrook J.I.
        • Coiera E.
        • Dunsmuir W.T.M.
        • Brown B.M.
        • Kelk N.
        • Paoloni R.
        • et al.
        The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19: 284-289
        • Rosenstein A.H.
        • Naylor B.
        Incidence and impact of physician and nurse disruptive behaviors in the emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 2011; (March 19. [Epub ahead of print])
        • Feufel M.A.
        • Robinson F.E.
        • Shalin V.L.
        The impact of medical record technologies on collaboration in emergency medicine.
        Int J Med Inform. 2010;
        • Heo J.H.
        • Kim Y.D.
        • Nam H.S.
        • Hong K.
        • Ahn S.H.
        • Cho H.J.
        • et al.
        A computerized in-hospital alert system for thrombolysis in acute stroke.
        Stroke. 2010; 41: 1978-1983
        • Schell C.L.
        • Wohl R.
        • Rathe R.
        • Schell W.J.
        Automated vs manual triage for bioterrorist disaster: a blinded crossover feasibility study comparing personal digital assistant to paper-based triage.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2006; 24: 843-846
        • Bates D.W.
        • Leape L.L.
        • Cullen D.J.
        • Laird N.
        • Petersen L.A.
        • Teich J.M.
        • et al.
        Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 1311-1316
        • Chisolm D.J.
        • Purnell T.S.
        • Cohen D.M.
        • McAlearney A.S.
        Clinician perceptions of an electronic medical record during the first year of implementation in emergency services.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010; 26: 107-110
        • Abujudeh H.H.
        • Kaewlai R.
        • Kodsi S.E.
        • Hamill M.A.
        Technical report: improving quality of communications in emergency radiology with a computerized whiteboard system.
        Clin Radiol. 2010; 65: 56-62
        • Kaliyadan F.
        • Venkitakrishnan S.
        • Manoj J.
        • Dharmaratnam A.D.
        Electronic medical records in dermatology: practical implications.
        Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009; 75: 157-161
        • Daniel G.W.
        • Ewen E.
        • Willey V.J.
        • Reese Iv C.L.
        • Shirazi F.
        • Malone D.C.
        Efficiency and economic benefits of a payer-based electronic health record in an emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17: 824-833
        • Spalding S.C.
        • Mayer P.H.
        • Ginde A.A.
        • Lowenstein S.R.
        • Yaron M.
        Impact of computerized physician order entry on ED patient length of stay.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2011; 29 ([Epub 2010 Mar 26]): 207-211