Advertisement

Prognostic performance of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) combined with qSOFA score

Published:February 04, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.088

      Abstract

      Objective

      We conducted this study to investigate whether ESI combined with qSOFA score (ESI + qSOFA) predicts hospital outcome better than ESI alone in the emergency department (ED).

      Methods

      This was a retrospective study for patients aged over 15 years who visited an ED of a tertiary referral hospital from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2015. We calculated and compared predictive performances of ESI alone and ESI + qSOFA for prespecified outcomes. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and ICU admission. We calculated in-hospital mortality rates by positive qSOFA in each subgroup divided according to ESI levels (1, 2, 3, 4 + 5).

      Results

      43,748 patients were enrolled. The area under receiver-operating characteristics curves were higher in ESI + qSOFA than in ESI alone for both mortality and composite outcome (0.786 vs. 0.777, P < .001 for mortality; 0.778 vs. 0.774, P < .001 for composite outcome). In each subgroup divided by ESI levels, patients with positive qSOFA had significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate compared to those with negative qSOFA (20.4% vs. 14.7%, P = .117 in ESI level 1 subgroup; 11.3% vs. 2.7%, P = .001 in ESI level 2 subgroup; 2.3% vs. 0.4%, P < .001 in ESI level 3 subgroup; 0.0% vs. 0.0% in ESI level 4 or 5 subgroup).

      Conclusion

      The prognostic performance of ESI + qSOFA for in-hospital mortality was significantly higher than that of ESI alone. Within each subgroup, patients with positive qSOFA had higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with negative qSOFA.

      Abbreviations:

      ESI (Emergency Severity Index), qSOFA (quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment), qSOFA+ESI (whether ESI combined with qSOFA score), ICU (intensive care unit), ED (emergency department)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Christ M.
        • Grossmann F.
        • Winter D.
        • Bingisser R.
        • Platz E.
        Modern triage in the emergency department.
        Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010; 107: 892-898
        • Weyrich P.
        • Christ M.
        • Celebi N.
        • Riessen R.
        Triage systems in the emergency department.
        Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2012; 107 ([quiz 9]): 67-78
        • McHugh M.
        • Tanabe P.
        • McClelland M.
        • Khare R.K.
        More patients are triaged using the Emergency Severity Index than any other triage acuity system in the United States.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 106-109
        • van der Wulp I.
        • Schrijvers A.J.
        • van Stel H.F.
        Predicting admission and mortality with the Emergency Severity Index and the Manchester Triage System: a retrospective observational study.
        Emerg Med J. 2009; 26: 506-509
        • Wuerz R.
        Emergency severity index triage category is associated with six-month survival. ESI Triage Study Group.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 61-64
        • Wuerz R.C.
        • Milne L.W.
        • Eitel D.R.
        • Travers D.
        • Gilboy N.
        Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7: 236-242
        • Singer M.
        • Deutschman C.S.
        • Seymour C.W.
        • Shankar-Hari M.
        • Annane D.
        • Bauer M.
        • et al.
        The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3).
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 801-810
        • Khwannimit B.
        • Bhurayanontachai R.
        • Vattanavanit V.
        Comparison of the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country.
        J Crit Care. 2017; 44: 156-160
        • Raith E.P.
        • Udy A.A.
        • Bailey M.
        • McGloughlin S.
        • MacIsaac C.
        • Bellomo R.
        • et al.
        Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 290-300
        • Wang J.Y.
        • Chen Y.X.
        • Guo S.B.
        • Mei X.
        • Yang P.
        Predictive performance of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment for mortality and ICU admission in patients with infection at the ED.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 1788-1793
        • Seymour C.W.
        • Liu V.X.
        • Iwashyna T.J.
        • Brunkhorst F.M.
        • Rea T.D.
        • Scherag A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3).
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 762-774
        • Freund Y.
        • Lemachatti N.
        • Krastinova E.
        • Van Laer M.
        • Claessens Y.E.
        • Avondo A.
        • et al.
        Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department.
        JAMA. 2017; 317: 301-308
        • April M.D.
        • Aguirre J.
        • Tannenbaum L.I.
        • Moore T.
        • Pingree A.
        • Thaxton R.E.
        • et al.
        Sepsis clinical criteria in emergency department patients admitted to an intensive care unit: an external validation study of quick sequential organ failure assessment.
        J Emerg Med. 2017; 52: 622-631
        • Williams J.M.
        • Greenslade J.H.
        • JV McKenzie
        • Chu K.
        • Brown A.F.
        • Lipman J.
        Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection.
        Chest. 2017; 151: 586-596
        • Ranzani O.T.
        • Zampieri F.G.
        • Besen B.A.
        • Azevedo L.C.
        • Park M.
        One-year survival and resource use after critical illness: impact of organ failure and residual organ dysfunction in a cohort study in Brazil.
        Crit Care. 2015; 19: 269
        • Kuriyama A.
        • Urushidani S.
        • Nakayama T.
        Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity.
        Emerg Med J. 2017; 34: 703-710
      1. Guidelines on the implementation of the ATS in emergency departments.
        • Ebrahimi M.
        • Heydari A.
        • Mazlom R.
        • Mirhaghi A.
        The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis.
        World J Emerg Med. 2015; 6: 94-99
        • Bullard M.J.
        • Chan T.
        • Brayman C.
        • Warren D.
        • Musgrave E.
        • Unger B.
        • et al.
        Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) guidelines.
        CJEM. 2014; 16: 485-489
        • Mirhaghi A.
        • Heydari A.
        • Mazlom R.
        • Ebrahimi M.
        The reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: meta-analysis.
        N Am J Med Sci. 2015; 7: 299-305
        • Parenti N.
        • Reggiani M.L.
        • Iannone P.
        • Percudani D.
        • Dowding D.
        A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2014; 51: 1062-1069
        • Culley J.M.
        • Svendsen E.
        • Craig J.
        • Tavakoli A.
        A validation study of 5 triage systems using data from the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, chlorine spill.
        J Emerg Nurs. 2014; 40: 453-460
        • Tanabe P.
        • Gimbel R.
        • Yarnold P.R.
        • Kyriacou D.N.
        • Adams J.G.
        Reliability and validity of scores on The Emergency Severity Index version 3.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 59-65
        • Chew W.M.
        • Birnbaumer D.M.
        Evaluation of the elderly patient with weakness: an evidence based approach.
        Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999; 17 ([x]): 265-278
        • Andersson A.K.
        • Omberg M.
        • Svedlund M.
        Triage in the emergency department—a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions.
        Nurs Crit Care. 2006; 11: 136-145
        • Grossmann F.F.
        • Zumbrunn T.
        • Frauchiger A.
        • Delport K.
        • Bingisser R.
        • Nickel C.H.
        At risk of undertriage? Testing the performance and accuracy of the emergency severity index in older emergency department patients.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 60 ([e3]): 317-325
        • Shah S.A.
        • Fleming S.
        • Thompson M.
        • Tarassenko L.
        Respiratory rate estimation during triage of children in hospitals.
        J Med Eng Technol. 2015; 39: 514-524