Obstetrics

COVID-19 in pregnancy and the puerperium: A review for emergency physicians

a b s t r a c t

Background: severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel virus responsible for causing the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19).

Objective: This article discusses the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in pregnant patients, the effects of preg- nancy on the course of COVID-19 disease, and the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes.

Discussion: The physiological and mechanical changes associated with pregnancy increase maternal susceptibil- ity to infections and complicate intubation and mechanical ventilation. The most common symptoms of COVID- 19 in pregnant patients are cough and fever, although many infected individuals are asymptomatic. The majority of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 disease have a mild course of illness and will recover without needing to deliver, but the risks of critical illness and need for mechanical ventilation are increased compared to the general population. Risk factors for death and severe disease include obesity, diabetes, and Maternal age > 40 years. Women in their Third trimester have the highest risk for critical illness, intensive care unit admis- sion, and need for mechanical ventilation. Adverse Fetal outcomes of maternal COVID-19 infection include in- creased risk of miscarriage, prematurity, and fetal growth restriction. Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is possible but has not been conclusively proven.

Conclusions: COVID-19 is a potentially deadly infection, but data are limited concerning the pregnant population. Pregnant patients appear to present similarly to the general population, with fever and cough being the most re- ported symptoms in studies. Knowledge of these presentations and outcomes can assist clinicians caring for these patients.

Published by Elsevier Inc.

  1. Introduction

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel enveloped ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus responsible for causing the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), a multi-system dis- ease ranging in severity from asymptomatic to fatal [1]. In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic [2]. Emergency clinicians are frequently the first point of healthcare contact for patients presenting with COVID-19. As such, the burden of counseling on the course of illness, Preventative measures, and treatment falls commonly on providers in the emergency department (ED). Additionally, many providers caring for patients in- fected with SARS-CoV-2 are pregnant or recently-pregnant, and under- standing the risks of exposure to COVID-19 can aid allocation of resources and guide protocols to protect them. Pregnant patients are

* Corresponding author at: 3841 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, United States of America

E-mail address: [email protected] (B. Long).

an especially vulnerable population in the time of the COVID-19 pan- demic, and clinician knowledge regarding the disease and its effects on pregnancy can aid emergency physicians in treatment planning and patient counseling.

  1. Methods

This narrative review provides a focused overview of COVID-19 in pregnancy for emergency clinicians. The authors searched PubMed and Google Scholar for articles using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) compliant keywords “pregnancy” and “COVID-19” or “corona- virus” or “SARS-CoV-2”. The search was conducted from database incep- tion to September 30, 2020. PubMed yielded 1066 articles, and Google Scholar yielded 13,400 articles. Authors evaluated case reports and se- ries, retrospective and prospective studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other narrative reviews. Authors also reviewed guidelines and supporting citations of included articles. The literature search was restricted to studies published in English, with focus on the emergency medicine and Critical care literature. Authors decided

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.055 0735-6757/Published by Elsevier Inc.

which studies to include for the review by consensus. When available, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were preferentially selected. These were followed sequentially by randomized controlled trials, pro- spective studies, retrospective studies, case reports, and other narrative reviews when alternate data were not available. A total of 59 resources were selected for inclusion in this narrative review.

  1. Discussion
    1. Pathophysiology of respiratory illnesses and other coronaviruses in pregnancy

The physiological and mechanical changes associated with preg- nancy increase maternal susceptibility to infections in general. Preg- nancy is a state of relative immunosuppression, caused by a change in the maternal immune system to prevent rejection of the semiallogenic fetus [3]. This occurs through a hormone-mediatED shift from a primar- ily type 1 T helper cell response to a type 2 T helper cell response, which is more anti-inflammatory in nature [3]. Increased estriol levels also de- crease CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, suppress inflammatory cytokine pro- duction, and promote the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines [3]. These immunologic shifts, and physiologic changes discussed later, pre- dispose pregnant individuals to a more severe and protracted disease course with Respiratory infections [3].

This phenomenon has been well documented with coronavirus in- fections in the past [4]. Given the relative novelty of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, data regarding its specific pathophysiologic impact in pregnancy are limited. However, recent coronavirus epidemics caused by the Mid- dle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respi- ratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-1) viruses in 2003 and 2012, respectively, can provide valuable informatin [5,6]. MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-1 ap- pear to cause more severe disease in pregnant patients compared to SARS-CoV-2 [6]. A 2020 meta-analysis calculated a mortality rate ap- proaching 25-30% in pregnant women with severe SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, whereas current estimates for SARS-CoV-2 mortality in pregnant women are less than 2% [6].

Data from SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV can also inform the response to SARS-CoV-2 until more specific data are available. In examining the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV outbreaks, significant morbidity and mor- tality were most common among patients in the second and third tri- mesters of pregnancy [5]. Adverse outcomes included miscarriage, small for gestational age neonates, and prematurity [5]. Fever, cough, and fatigue were the most commonly reported symptoms with both SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV [6]. The most common laboratory abnor- malities were lymphocytopenia, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and leukopenia [6]. A meta-analysis of pregnant women hospitalized for infection with SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, or SARS-CoV-2 noted that 90% of these patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of pneumo- nia either on plain x-ray or computed tomography (CT), even when asymptomatic [6]. This meta-analysis also noted an increased rate of preterm birth, caesarean delivery, Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and preeclampsia in women diagnosed with any of the three coronaviruses compared to the general population [6]. There have been no documented cases of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-

pregnant women presenting or admitted to the hospital tested positive for COVID-19 [7]. Similar to the general population, the predominant features of Symptomatic COVID-19 in pregnant patients were fever, cough, dyspnea, and lymphopenia [7]. The largest cohort study to date reported cough and fever as the most common symptoms in pregnant women presenting with COVID-19, 33% and 29%, respectively, rates similar to the 40% and 39% reported in the Allotey et al. cohort study [7,8]. Compared to non-pregnant women of reproductive age, pregnant or recently-pregnant women with COVID-19 were less likely to report fever or myalgias [7]. A French cohort study suggested that the presence of Gastrointestinal symptoms was associated with more severe disease [9]. Symptoms do not appear to differ based on gestational age at the time of presentation [10].

Both leukocytosis and leukopenia occur commonly in pregnant patients with COVID-19. A small case study noted that leukocytosis, lymphopenia, increased neutrophil ratio, and normal presenting tem- perature were more common in pregnant versus nonpregnant women with COVID-19 [10]. In contrast, a later meta-analysis found leukopenia to be the most common laboratory abnormality in these patients (66.1%) but supported the finding of lymphopenia as a common abnor- mality (48.3%) [6]. Other common laboratory abnormalities reported in the literature include an elevated CRP, D-dimer, and lactate dehydroge- nase (LDH) [10,11]. The most common CT finding of COVID-19 pneumo- nia in pregnant patients included Ground glass opacities and bilateral infiltrates [6,7,10,11]. A meta-analysis of 42 studies comprising 247 pregnant patients with COVID-19 found that focal unilateral or bilateral ground-glass opacities were the most common imaging findings in mild or asymptomatic disease, while all patients with critical illness had dif- fuse bilateral ground-glass opacities with subpleural involvement and pleural effusion on imaging [5,6]. This study found abnormal imaging in 89% of patients, 8.7% of whom were asymptomatic at the time of im- aging [11]. This is similar to studies including patients with SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV, which showed that abnormal imaging findings were common in asymptomatic pregnant patients [5,6].

Given the prevalence of community spread of SARS-CoV-2 and rela- tively high rates of positive testing in otherwise asymptomatic individ- uals, it is important to not fall prey to premature closure in pregnant patients who test positive for COVID-19 [12]. Many conditions common to pregnancy can present with fever, cough, or dyspnea, and COVID-19 increases risk for several common pregnancy conditions, including pre- eclampsia and pulmonary embolism (PE) [7]. The differential diagnosis for the symptoms of COVID-19 in pregnancy is broad and includes PE, cardiomyopathy, pleural or pericardial effusion, pre-eclampsia, gesta- tional rhinitis, physiologic dyspnea, and other etiologies of viral/bacte- rial pneumonia. Common complications of pregnancy and the puerperium should remain high on the differential for these patients, regardless of the results of COVID-19 testing. Patients should be evalu- ated for these common conditions based on their history and examina- tion. Table 1 demonstrates the most common signs and symptoms,

Table 1

Clinical Manifestations of COVID-19 in Pregnancy [7,8,11]

1 or MERS-CoV [5,6].

Signs/symptoms Laboratory

findings

Imaging findings

    1. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in pregnancy

Testing in non-pregnant individuals most commonly occurs when they present with symptoms or a concerning contact history, whereas

Cough ?/? Leukocytes Unilateral or bilateral ground-glass opacities Fever ? Lymphocytes Pleural effusions

Dyspnea ? CRP

Myalgias ? LDH

pregnant individuals are often tested for COVID-19 when presenting for care for pregnancy or reasons unrelated to the Covid-19 outbreak

Anosmia / dysgeusia

? D-dimera

a

[5,6]. A living systematic review of 28 studies including 11,432 patients found that 1 in 10 pregnant or recently-pregnant women presenting or admitted to the hospital tested positive for COVID-19 [7]. Of these, three quarters were asymptomatic, and one in twenty asymptomatic

Nausea ? IL-6

Vomiting Diarrhea

a The combination of elevated D-dimer and IL-6 is a poor prognostic indicator [11].

laboratory findings, and imaging findings in pregnant patients with COVID-19.

    1. Clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnancy

Data on the course of COVID-19 in pregnant women are mixed. Small international case series suggest a similar course of illness in preg- nant and non-pregnant women [9,13-16]. Most studies suggest that critical illness is rare in pregnant patients but slightly increased when compared to the general population [8,11,13,17,18]. One study reported that approximately 90% of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 disease recovered without needing to deliver [7]. A meta-analysis of 637 pregnant women with COVID-19 found that 76.5% of patients had mild disease, 15% had severe disease, and 7.7% had critical disease at the time of admission (Table 2) [11]. Of those with mild disease, approx- imately 3% went on to develop severe or critical infection [11]. Those pa- tients with severe or critical disease accounted for the majority of poor maternal and neonatal outcomes, including maternal death, stillbirth, neonatal death, and NICU admission [11].

Other studies also demonstrate Severe outcomes in pregnant pa- tients with COVID-19. While estimated mortality rates for pregnant pa- tients with COVID-19 are 0.6-2%, comparable to the general population, those with critical disease at the time of presentation account for the vast majority of deaths secondary to COVID-19 [7,11]. A recent study found an increased risk of severe illness and mechanical ventilation in pregnant women compared to their non-pregnant counterparts when adjusted for age, race, and co-morbidities [19]. The rate of intensive care admission rises with increasing gestational age, with one study reporting more than 90% of pregnant patients requiring ICU in their third trimester [11]. Data suggest 40% of pregnant patients who died from COVID-19 had obesity, diabetes, or maternal age greater than or equal to 40 years [7,11,17,19]. Complications of severe illness include the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal mem- brane oxygenation (ECMO), preterm delivery, and COVID-related car- diomyopathy [19]. Pregnant women with COVID-19 were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and admission to an ICU. Increased maternal age, high body mass index, pre-existing hypertension, and pre-existing diabetes were associated with severe COVID-19, and the presence of maternal co-morbidities was a risk factor for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation [7,8,10,11]. The severity of maternal disease correlated with risk for NICU admission or neonatal death [11]. The combination of elevated D-dimer and interleukin-6 levels was likewise associated with more severe disease and found to be present in 60% of severely ill and 80% of critically ill pregnant women with COVID-19, re- spectively [11]. Unfortunately, data on baseline levels of these labs in pregnancy are limited, making comparisons difficult. Additionally, COVID-19 is associated with the development of cardiomyopathy in 7-33% of the general population [20,21]. Data on COVID-19 cardiomy- opathy in pregnancy are limited, as there is only one small case series reporting on two pregnant patients who developed cardiomyopathy with COVID-19 [22]. Due to lack of data, it is uncertain whether the risk of COVID-19-related cardiomyopathy is increased in pregnant pa- tients compared to the general population.

Table 2

COVID-19 severity by Clinical Findings [19,23]

Classification Definition

Asymptomatic -Positive SARS-CoV-2 testing but no symptoms

Mild -Fever, cough, headache but no shortness of breath, dyspnea, or abnormal imaging

Moderate -Clinical or radiographic evidence of mild pneumonia

\\O2 saturation >93% on room air at sea level

Severe -Dyspnea, respiratory rate >= 30/ min, O2 saturation <= 93%, P:F ratio <300, or >50% lung infiltrates

Critical -Respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or Multiorgan dysfunction

    1. Effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and the perinatal period

The PRIORITY study, which included 179 infants born to COVID- positive mothers and 84 infants born to COVID-negative mothers, found no increased risk of preterm birth, NICU admission, and respira- tory disease in the COVID-positive cohort, although NICU admission and preterm birth were increased in the sub-group of mothers testing positive 0-14 days before delivery [2,4,8-11,13-15,18,24-26]. The larg- est cohort study to date followed the courses of 242 COVID-19 positive pregnant women and their 248 infants through the third trimester of pregnancy and one month postpartum [11]. Notable outcomes of this study include a higher rate of caesarean delivery and premature birth in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 symptoms, findings that have been replicated in several cohort studies and meta-analyses [11]. It is uncertain whether the higher rate of prematurity derives from a need to deliver secondary to COVID-19 related Maternal complications or from effects of the disease on the pregnancy. Rates of preterm birth and caesarean delivery are increased in COVID-19 patients regardless of the Severity of disease, suggesting that these outcomes may be iatro- genic. One meta-analysis found that preterm delivery occurred in ap- proximately one third of patients with COVID-19 [11]. Of these, 40% were early preterm deliveries (occurring between 24 weeks and 33 weeks 6 days gestation), and 60% were late preterm deliveries (oc- curring between 34 weeks and 36 weeks 6 days gestation) [11]. Rates of caesarean delivery are extremely high in COVID-19 patients in this meta-analysis, with reported rates of nearly 85% [25,26]. Notably, they also found that the only documented indication for caesarean delivery in approximately half of these cases was maternal COVID-19, again sug- gesting that this effect may be iatrogenic in nature [11].

Data on Fetal complications from COVID-19 are limited. Evidence sug- gests that miscarriage is more common in patients who became ill in the first trimester compared to the second trimester, with rates of 16.1% and 3.5%, respectively [27-30]. While direct data are not available, abnormal fetal growth due to placental insufficiency is a concern in pregnant pa- tients due to documented uteroplacental vascular malperfusion, intervillous inflammation, and thrombosis of fetal intervillous vessels in maternal COVID-19 infection [8]. This concern derives from 4 studies reporting on the histopathological examinations of 14 placentas from pa- tients with clinically mild COVID-19 which found occlusive fibrin deposi- tion and non-occlusive thrombi with placental hypoperfusion in all specimens [11,31]. Half of these cases resulted in preterm delivery, and one case each of placental abruption, second-trimester miscarriage, and small for gestational age infant were also reported [23-26].

Neonates whose mothers were admitted for the treatment of COVID-19 infection had an odds ratio of 3 of prematurity, regardless of the severity of maternal disease [24]. Spontaneous preterm labor is not increased compared to the general population, and caesarean sec- tions account for nearly all the preterm deliveries reported [7]. Accord- ingly, most of the complications in neonates born to COVID-19 positive mothers are a result of prematurity rather than COVID-19 infection. In- fants with mothers who tested positive closer to delivery were more likely to be admitted to the NICU than those with mothers who tested positive two or more weeks prior to delivery [8]. Stillbirths and neonatal Death rates are not increased compared to the general population [8]. In a recent cohort study, nearly a tenth of the neonates born to COVID-19 positive mothers presented to the ED in the first month of life [24]. None tested positive for COVID-19 [32-35]. This is in line with the findings of the PRIORITY study, which reported no cases of pneumonia or lower re- spiratory disease in neonates born to COVID-positive mothers at 6-8 weeks of age [33,35]. Several case series report mild symptoms in neonates diagnosed with COVID-19 at or shortly after birth [32-35]. The most common findings of COVID-19 in neonates are fever, pneumo- nia, cyanosis, respiratory distress, and feeding intolerance [8]. The ma- jority of patients in these case series had mild symptoms and favorable outcomes, and most complications were related to prematu- rity and sepsis, rather than SARS-CoV-2 [11,24].

Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains widely debated. No cases of vertical or horizontal transmission were found in the Marin Ga- briel at al study [8]. However, Turan et al. reported in their meta- analysis that 2% of infants born to mothers with COVID-19 tested posi- tive 16-24 h after birth by naso- and oropharyngeal swabs; the PRIORITY study reported a similar positivity rate of 1.1% in infants born to COVID-19 infected mothers [11,24]. SARS-CoV-2 virions have also been visualized in the syncytiotrophoblasts and microvilli of the placenta, suggesting that transplacental transfer may be possible [36]. Both Ig-G and Ig-M antibodies against COVID-19 have been found in se- ronegative neonates born to COVID-19 infected mothers [26,27]. This is notable because Ig-M antibodies cannot cross the placenta, suggesting a fetal immune response against the virus in neonates born to an infected mother. While SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from maternal vaginal mucosa and stool samples, it has also been isolated from cord blood, pla- centa, and amniotic fluid, and there are no data to suggest that caesar- ean delivery is safer or reduces the risk of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in these patients [11].

    1. COVID treatments in pregnancy

human data on the effects of COVID-19 treatments on pregnancy are limited. Current treatments for patients with COVID-19 include dexa- methasone, convalescent plasma, and the antiviral medication remdesivir [36]. The RECOVERY trial, which demonstrated a Mortality benefit of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 who required re- spiratory support, did include pregnant and breastfeeding patients and reported no pregnancy-associated adverse outcomes [37]. Use of high doses of dexamethasone in early pregnancy has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes in mice, mares, and dogs [38]. These outcomes included early pregnancy termination, impaired fetal growth, and abnormal placentation [38]. However, the RECOVERY trial utilized dexamethasone 6 mg daily, which is not high dose [37]. Data on the safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 disease during pregnancy are emerging, and available data on the efficacy of this treat- ment in the general population currently demonstrate no difference in mortality [39]. Two ongoing trials of convalescent plasma in pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease are ongoing (NCT04397757 and NCT04388527) [40,41]. Documented adverse effects of convalescent plasma use in the general population are rare but include febrile and al- lergic transfusion reactions, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), and anaphylaxis [42]. Randomized trials of Remdesivir use in COVID-19 have excluded pregnant and breastfeeding women, but the medication was used without documented harm in pregnant women during the Ebola and Marburg virus epidemics [43]. Remdesivir is avail- able for the treatment of severe COVID-19 disease in pregnant women on a compassionate-use basis in the United States at the time of this article’s production [44]. Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, a popular treatment at the start of the pandemic, is not recommended for use in COVID-19 disease at the time of this review [45,46]. Data from multiple trials have demonstrated no benefit with the use of chloroquine or

of the anatomic and physiologic changes of pregnancy on intubation and mechanical ventilation (Table 3). Elevation of the diaphragm by the expanding uterus reduces functional residual capacity [52]. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production are increased in pregnant patients due to the metabolic demands of the fetus [52]. This combina- tion results in a shorter safe apnea time and faster desaturation follow- ing induction and paralysis. Pregnant patients are also at increased risk of aspiration secondary to a progesterone-mediated decrease in the tone of the Lower esophageal sphincter, which can complicate intubation and positive-pressure ventilation in these patients [11]. This is compounded by edema and hyperemia of the upper airways in pregnant patients, which increase the friability of the upper airways and decrease their cal- iber [53,54]. Finally, increased progesterone levels result in increased tidal volume and minute ventilation in pregnant patients, inducing a state of respiratory alkalosis that promotes the transfer of oxygen from maternal circulation to the fetus [52-54]. This should be considered when interpreting pre- and post-intubation blood gases, and every effort should be made to match the patient’s pre-intubation minute ventilation once mechanical ventilation is initiated to avoid acidosis and fetal harm. While permissive hypercapnia and hypoxia have proven effective in the management of Acute respiratory distress syndrome in the gen- eral population, it is uncertain how safe this strategy is in pregnant pa- tients, who rely on maternal respiratory alkalosis for transplacental gas transfer to the fetus [52-54]. Data on ECMO as a Rescue therapy in preg- nant patients with critical COVID-19 are limited, but it may be associated with favorable maternal and Fetal outcomes in pregnant patients failing other therapies [11,55]. Because the success of ECMO as a salvage ther- apy is often dependent on its early use, consultation and potential trans- fer to an ECMO expert center should be considered in patients with critical disease failing conventional therapy [7,11,55].

    1. Disposition of COVID-19 pregnant patients and patient counseling

Patients with mild disease and no co-morbidities can generally be discharged home with close return precautions, as approximately 3% will develop more severe disease (Fig. 1) [11]. Consideration should be given to hospitalizing patients with mild disease complicated by one or more comorbidities, as these patients have a higher risk of decompensa- tion and severe disease [16]. Factors associated with more severe disease include obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, maternal age greater than 40 years, and third-trimester pregnancy [16].Those with severe or critical disease should be hospitalized, preferably at a center that has ob- stetrics services and an adult and neonatal ICU (Fig. 1) [8].

Table 3

The impact of anatomic and physiologic changes of pregnancy on respiratory failure and intubation

Anatomic/ Effect Practical considerations physiologic change

hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 [47]. Additionally, these medications are associated with maternal dysrhythmias, and hydroxychloroquine

Edema and hyperemia of the upper airways

Increased mucosal friability, decreased caliber of upper airways

Consider using a smaller caliber endotracheal tube

can cross the placenta and accumulate in fetal ocular tissue [48-50].

Given the lack of documented benefit and the known risks of chloroquine/ hydroxychloroquine, they are not recommended for use in COVID-19. As pregnancy is a Hypercoagulable state, thrombo-

Decreased functional residual capacity

Faster oxygen

consumption

Shorter safe apnea time Expect rapid desaturation; be

prepared to intubate immediately after paralyzing

prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin in pregnant patients with COVID-19 should be considered, particularly those with elevated D-dimer levels [51]. The decision to start thromboprophylaxis should

gravid abdomen Aortocaval compression

with Prone positioning

If proning is necessary, offset the gravid uterus with pillows/blankets

be made in conjunction with the patient and their obstetrician.

    1. Respiratory failure in pregnancy

Increased tidal

volume and minute ventilation

Physiologic respiratory

alkalosis

Set ventilator to match patient’s

pre-intubation minute ventilation

Respiratory failure can complicate the course of COVID-19 in preg- nant patients. Emergency physicians should be cognizant of the impact

Diminished Lower esophageal sphincter tone

Increased aspiration risk Avoid bagging if possible

Consider intubating in an upright position

Image of Fig. 1

Fig. 1. Algorithm for the disposition of pregnant patients with COVID-19.

    1. Breastfeeding

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in late pregnancy or the puerpe- rium may express concern about breastfeeding. Evidence regarding the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in breastmilk is limited and therefore insuf- ficient to make a recommendation for or against breastfeeding by COVID-19 infected mothers. Two studies looking at a total of 9 patients found no molecular evidence of the virus in breastmilk, whereas one study reported finding the virus in breastmilk more than one week after delivery [56,57]. Given the paucity of evidence for transmission in breastmilk and the proven benefits of breastfeeding, the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend continued breastfeeding by mothers who are COVID-19 positive as long as basic hygiene measures are followed, including the wearing of a facemask by the mother during feeding [58,59]. One study noted a decreased rate of breastfeeding in COVID-19 positive mothers, a factor previously documented to be associated with maternal-newborn separation at birth, which has been common in mothers positive for COVID-19 [8].

  1. Conclusion

COVID-19 is a potentially deadly infection, but data are limited concerning the pregnant population. Heterogeneity in study populations, testing protocols, and study results make it difficult to draw widespread conclusions, especially in studies with pregnant and puerperal individ- uals. Pregnant patients appear to present similarly to the general popula- tion, with fever and cough being the most reported symptoms in studies. Other than direct testing, no laboratory or imaging finding is sensitive or specific for the virus. Ground-glass opacities and bilateral infiltrates are the most commonly reported CT findings but are neither sensitive nor specific for COVID-19 infection. Lymphopenia has been commonly re- ported, as well as leukocytosis and leukopenia. Patients with mild disease and no co-morbidities can be safely discharged home. Close follow-up and return precautions should be provided, as 3% progress to severe or critical illness. Risk factors for death and severe disease include obesity, diabetes, and maternal age > 40 years. Women in their third trimester have the highest risk for critical illness, ICU admission, and need for me- chanical ventilation. Evidence for transmission of SARS-CoV-19 through

breastmilk is limited, and current guidelines recommend continued breastfeeding by COVID-19 positive mothers.

Declaration of Competing Interest

NONE for Dr. Boushra, Dr. Koyfman, and Dr. Long.

Acknowledgements

MB, BL, and AK conceived the idea for this manuscript and contrib- uted substantially to the writing and editing of the review. This manu- script did not utilize any grants or funding, and it has not been presented in abstract form. This clinical review has not been published, it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible au- thorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. This review does not reflect the views or opinions of the U.S. government, Department of Defense, U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, or SAUSHEC EM Residency Program.

References

  1. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30185-9.
  2. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19; 11 March 2020 https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s- opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19–11-march-2020 (Accessed September 29, 2020).
  3. Mathad JS, Gupta A. pulmonary infections in pregnancy. Semin Respir Crit Care Med.

2017;38(2):174-84. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602375.

  1. Perlman S. Another decade, another coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):760-2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe2001126.
  2. Galang RR, Chang K, Strid P, et al. Severe coronavirus infections in pregnancy: a sys- tematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):262-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG. 0000000000004011.
  3. Diriba K, Awulachew E, Getu E. The effect of coronavirus infection (SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV) during pregnancy and the possibility of vertical

maternal-fetal transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2020;25(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-020-00439-w.

  1. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;370. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3320.
  2. Gabriel Marin, Miguel A, Mar Reyne Vergeli, Sonia Caserio Carbonero, Sole Laia, Tamara Carrizosa Molina, et al. Maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes with COVID-19: a multicenter study of 242 pregnances and their 248 infant newborns during their first month of life. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002902 Still in print.
  3. Cohen J, Vignaux O, Jacquemard F. Covid-19 in pregnant women: general data from a French national survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;251(1):267-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.002.
  4. Liu D, Li L, Wu X, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with coronavi- rus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: a preliminary analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 215(1):127-32. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23072.
  5. Turan O, Hakim A, Dashraath P, Jeslyn WJL, Wright A, Abdul-Kadir R. Clinical charac- teristics, prognostic factors, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 in- fection among hospitalized pregnant women: A systematic review. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13329 ijgo.13329.
  6. Kim GU, Kim MJ, Ra SH, et al. Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptom- atic patients with mild COVID-19. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(7). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.04.040 948.e1-948.e3.
  7. Hirshberg A, Kern-Goldberger AR, Levine LD, et al. Care of critically ill pregnant pa- tients with coronavirus disease 2019: a case series. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223 (2):286-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.029.
  8. Yan J, Guo J, Fan C, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant women: a report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2020.04.014 111.e1-111.e14.
  9. Ferrazzi E, Frigerio L, Savasi V, et al. Mode of delivery and clinical findings in COVID- 19 infected pregnant women in northern Italy. SSRN Electron J. April 2020. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562464.
  10. Salvatori G, de Rose DU, Concato C, et al. Managing COVID-19-positive maternal- infant dyads: an Italian experience. Breastfeed Med. 2020;15(5):347-8. https:// doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2020.0095.
  11. San-Juan R, Barbero P, Fernandez-Ruiz M, et al. Incidence and clinical profiles of COVID-19 pneumonia in pregnant women: a single-Centre cohort study from Spain. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;23:100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020. 100407.
  12. Schwartz DA. An analysis of 38 pregnant women with COVID-19, their newborn in- fants, and maternal-fetal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: maternal coronavirus infec- tions and pregnancy outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(7):799-805. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0901-SA.
  13. Ellington S, Strid P, Tong VT, et al. Characteristics of Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by pregnancy status — United States, January 22-June 7, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(25): 769-75. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6925a1.
  14. Clerkin KJ, Fried JA, Raikhelkar J, et al. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Circula- tion. 2020;141(20):1648-55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.

046941.

  1. Thompson JL, Nguyen LM, Noble KN, Aronoff DM. COVID-19-related disease severity in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. September 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji. 13339.
  2. Juusela A, Nazir M, Gimovsky M. Two cases of coronavirus 2019-related cardiomy- opathy in pregnancy. Am J Obstetr Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(2):100113. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100113.
  3. What’s new | COVID-19 treatment guidelines; 2020 https://www.covid1 9treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/whats-new/ (Accessed October 18, 2020).
  4. Flaherman VJ, Afshar Y, Boscardin J, et al. Infant outcomes following maternal infec- tion with SARS-CoV-2: first report from the PRIORITY study. Clin Infect Dis. Septem- ber 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1411.
  5. Fenizia C, Biasin M, Cetin I, et al. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission during pregnancy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020- 18933-4.
  6. Carosso A, Cosma S, Serafini P, Benedetto C, Mahmood T. How to reduce the poten- tial risk of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during vaginal delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;250:246-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.065.
  7. Baergen RN, Heller DS. Placental pathology in Covid-19 positive mothers: prelimi- nary findings. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2020;23(3):177-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1093526620925569.
  8. Chen S, Huang B, Luo DJ, et al. Pregnant women with new coronavirus infection: a clinical characteristics and placental pathological analysis of three cases. Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of Pathology. 2020;49(0). https://doi.org/10. 3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200225-00138 E005.
  9. Kuhrt K, McMicking J, Nanda S, Nelson-Piercy C, Shennan A. Placental abruption in a twin pregnancy at 32 weeks’ gestation complicated by coronavirus disease 2019 without vertical transmission to the babies. Am J Obstetr Gynecol MFM. 2020;2 (3):100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100135.
  10. Baud D, Greub G, Favre G, et al. Second-trimester miscarriage in a pregnant woman with SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2198-200. https://doi.org/10. 1001/jama.2020.7233.
  11. Knight Dphil M, Bunch K, Vousden N, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m2107. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.m2107.
  12. Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical trans- mission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809-15. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3.
  13. Wei M, Yuan J, Liu Y, Fu T, Yu X, Zhang ZJ. Novel coronavirus infection in hospitalized infants under 1 year of age in China. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1313-4. https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jama.2020.2131.
  14. Zhu H, Wang L, Fang C, et al. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl Pediatr. 2020;9(1):51-60. https://doi.org/10.21037/ tp.2020.02.06.
  15. Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W, et al. Neonatal early-onset infection with SARS-CoV-2 in 33 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174(7):722-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0878.
  16. Tobaiqy M, Qashqary M, Al-Dahery S, et al. Therapeutic management of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. Infect Prevent Pract. 2020;2(3):100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100061.
  17. Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson J, et al. Dexamethasone for COVID-19-Preliminary Re- port Effect of Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19-preliminary report RECOVERY Collaborative Group*. medRxiv. June 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1101/2020.06.22.20137273 2020.06.22.20137273.
  18. Solano ME, Arck PC. Steroids, Pregnancy and Fetal Development. Front Immunol. 2020;10:3017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03017.
  19. Joyner MJ, Bruno KA, Klassen SA, et al. Safety update: COVID-19 convalescent plasma in 20,000 hospitalized patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(9):1888-97. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.028.
  20. COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma for Mechanically Ventilated Population – Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04388527; 2020 (Accessed October 5, 2020).
  21. COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Pneumonia Caused by SARS-CoV-2. – Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov. https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04397757; 2020 (Accessed October 5, 2020).
  22. Piechotta V, Chai KL, Valk SJ, et al. Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immuno- globulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2020(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub2.
  23. Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of Ebola virus disease therapeutics. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(24):2293-303. https://doi.org/10. 1056/NEJMoa1910993.
  24. Igbinosa I, Miller S, Bianco K, et al. Use of remdesivir for pregnant patients with se- vere novel coronavirus disease 2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.2020.08.001.
  25. Huybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Zhu Y, et al. Hydroxychloroquine early in pregnancy and risk of birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. September 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.2020.09.007.
  26. Lacroix I, Benevent J, Damase-Michel C. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine during pregnancy: what do we know? Therapies. 2020;75(4):384-5. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.therap.2020.05.004.
  27. Hussain N, Chung E, Heyl J, et al. A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19. Cureus. 2020;12(8). https://doi.org/10.7759/ cureus.10005.
  28. Louchet M, Sibiude J, Peytavin G, Picone O, Treluyer J-M, Mandelbrot L. Placental transfer and safety in pregnancy of medications under investigation to treat corona- virus disease 2019. Am J Obstetr Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100159. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100159.
  29. Klinger G, Morad Y, Westall CA, et al. Ocular toxicity and antenatal exposure to chlo- roquine or hydroxychloroquine for rheumatic diseases. Lancet. 2001;358(9284): 813-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06004-4.
  30. Osadchy A, Ratnapalan T, Koren G. Ocular toxicity in children exposed in utero to an- timalarial drugs: review of the literature. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(12):2504-8. https:// doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.110686.
  31. Carlo Di Renzo G, Giardina I. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Consider thromboembolic disorders and thromboprophylaxis; 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ajog.
  32. Schwaiberger D, Karcz M, Menk M, Papadakos PJ, Dantoni SE. Respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation in the pregnant patient. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(1):85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2015.08.001.
  33. Lapinsky SE. Management of Acute Respiratory Failure in pregnancy. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;38(2):201-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1600909.
  34. Lucarelli E, Behn C, Lashley S, Smok D, Benito C, Oyelese Y. Mechanical ventilation in pregnancy due to COVID-19: a cohort of three cases. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37(1): 1066-9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713664.
  35. Fiore A, Piscitelli M, Adodo DK, et al. Successful use of extracorporeal membrane ox- ygenation postpartum as rescue therapy in a woman with COVID-19. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.088.
  36. Gross R, Conzelmann C, Muller JA, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human breastmilk. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1757-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (20)31181-8.
  37. Gabriel MAM, Martinez AMM, Martinez MEM, Pedroche JA. Negative transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to hand-expressed colostrum from SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers. Breastfeed Med. 2020;15(8):492-4. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2020.0183.
  38. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Breastfeeding | Breastfeeding | CDC; 2020 https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/maternal- or-infant-illnesses/covid-19-and-breastfeeding.html (Accessed September 29, 2020).
  39. Breastfeeding and COVID-19: Scientific brief-2-Limitations; 2020. https://doi.org/10. 1101/2020.05.04.20089995.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *