Advertisement

Language preference does not influence stroke patients' symptom recognition or emergency care time metrics

Published:November 02, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.064

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Our objective was to determine whether acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients' language preference is associated with differences in time from symptom discovery to hospital arrival, activation of emergency medical services, door-to-imaging time (DTI), and door-to-needle (DTN) time.

      Methods

      We identified consecutive AIS patients presenting to a single urban, tertiary, academic center between 01/2003–05/2014 for whom language preference was available. Data were abstracted from the institution's Research Patient Data Registry and Get with the Guidelines-Stroke Registry. Bivariate and regression models evaluated the relationship between language preference and: 1) time from symptom onset to hospital arrival, 2) use of EMS, 3) DTI, and 4) DTN time.

      Results

      Of 3190 AIS patients, 300 (9.4%) were non-English preferring (NEP). Comparing NEP to English preferring (EP) patients in unadjusted or adjusted analyses, time from symptom discovery to arrival and rate of EMS utilization were not significantly different (overall median time 157 min, IQR 55–420; EMS utilization: 65% vs. 61.3% p = 0.21). There was also no significant differences in DTI or in likelihood of guideline-recommended DTI ≤ 25 min (overall median 59 min, IQR 29–127; DTI ≤ 25 min 24.3% vs. 21.3% p = 0.29) or DTN time or in likelihood of guideline-recommended DTN ≤ 60 min (overall median 53 min, IQR 36–73; DTN ≤ 60 min 62.5% vs. 58.2% p = 0.60).

      Conclusion

      Consistent with prior reports examining disparities in care, a systems-based approach to acute stroke prevents differences in hospital-based metrics. Reassuringly, NEP and EP patients also had similar speed of symptom recognition and EMS utilization.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Metias M.M.
        • Eisenberg N.
        • Clemente M.D.
        • et al.
        Public health campaigns and their effect on stroke knowledge in a high-risk urban population: a five-year study.
        Vascular. 2017; 25: 497-503https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538117691879
        • Kleindorfer D.
        • Khoury J.
        • Broderick J.P.
        • et al.
        Temporal trends in public awareness of stroke.
        Stroke. 2009; 40: 2502-2506https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551861
        • Sharrief A.Z.
        • Johnson B.
        • Urrutia V.C.
        Stroke outreach in an inner city market: a platform for identifying African American males for stroke prevention interventions.
        Front Neurol. 2015; 6: 133https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00133
        • Williams O.
        • Leighton-Herrmann Quinn E.
        • Teresi J.
        • et al.
        Improving community stroke preparedness in the HHS (hip-hop stroke) randomized clinical trial.
        Stroke. 2018; 49: 972-979https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019861
        • Jones S.P.
        • Jenkinson A.J.
        • Leathley M.J.
        • Watkins C.L.
        Stroke knowledge and awareness: an integrative review of the evidence.
        Age Ageing. 2010; 39: 11-22https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afp196
        • Robinson T.G.
        • Reid A.
        • Haunton V.J.
        • Wilson A.
        • Naylor A.R.
        The face arm speech test: does it encourage rapid recognition of important stroke warning symptoms?.
        Emerg Med J. 2013; 30: 467-471https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-201471
        • Flores G.
        Language barriers to health Care in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 229-231https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp058316
        • Erfe B.L.
        • Siddiqui K.A.
        • Schwamm L.H.
        • Mejia N.I.
        Relationship between language preference and intravenous thrombolysis among acute ischemic stroke patients.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003782
        • Erfe B.M.L.
        • Siddiqui K.A.
        • Schwamm L.H.
        • Kirwan C.
        • Nunes A.
        • Mejia N.I.
        Professional medical interpreters influence the quality of acute ischemic stroke care for patients who speak languages other than English.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006175
        • Fonarow G.C.
        • Reeves M.J.
        • Smith E.E.
        • et al.
        Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in get with the guidelines-stroke.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 291-302https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.921858
        • Stroke (Stroke Heroes Act FAST)
        Massachusetts Health Promotion Clearinghouse. Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
        (Accessed January 21, 2019)