Multi-center implementation of automated age-adjusted D-dimer results reduces unnecessary PE imaging

Published:November 02, 2020DOI:



      Several previous studies have investigated the clinical utility of age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE).


      We performed a pre/post implementation study, using data from a mid-Atlantic healthcare system comprising 6 hospitals and 400,000 ED visits to determine whether implementing age adjusted D-dimer cutoffs reduced the number of imaging tests performed.


      Retrospective study of all patients who had a D-dimer performed during ED visits between September 2015 to September 2018. On March 21, 2017, the D-dimer upper limit of normal system-wide was increased for patients over 50 to: Age (years) x 0.01μg/mL. D-dimer results were displayed as normal or high based on automated age adjustment. EHR Chart review was performed 1.5 years prior to implementation of age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs, as well as 1.5 years after to evaluate mortality and test accuracy characteristics such as false negative rates. Comparisons were made using chi-square testing.


      22,302 D-dimers were performed pre-implementation of which 10,837 (48.6%) were positive resulting in 7218 (32.3%) imaging studies. After implementation of age-adjusted d-dimer, 25,082 were performed of which 10,851 (43.2%) were positive resulting in 7017 (28.0%) imaging studies. (pre: 48.6%, post: 43.2%; p < 0.01). A significantly lower proportion of patients had a positive d-dimer (pre: 48.6%, post: 43.2%; p < 0.01) and underwent imaging post-implementation (pre: 32.3%, post: 28.0%; p < 0.05) a relative risk reduction of 13.3. This absolute risk reduction of 4.4% is associated with 1104 less scans in the post-implementation group while still increasing test accuracy from 53.7% to 59.2% (p < 0.05).


      Implementation of an automated age-adjusted D-dimer positive reference value reduced CT and V/Q imaging in this population by 4.4% while increasing test accuracy in a regional, heterogeneous six-hospital system.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Silverstein M.D.
        • Heit J.A.
        • Mohr D.N.
        • Petterson T.M.
        • O’Fallon W.M.
        • Melton L.J.
        Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study.
        Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23; 158: 585-593
        • Wolf S.J.
        • Hahn S.A.
        • Nentwich L.M.
        • Raja A.S.
        • Silvers S.M.
        • Brown M.D.
        Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute venous thromboembolic disease.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May 1; 71: e59-109
        • Crawford F.
        • Andras A.
        • Welch K.
        • Sheares K.
        • Keeling D.
        • Chappell F.M.
        D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 8
        • Sharp Adam L.
        • et al.
        An age-adjusted d-dimer threshold for emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolus: accuracy and clinical implications.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 67: 249-257
        • Sheele Johnathan M.
        • et al.
        A retrospective evaluation of the age-adjusted d-dimer versus the conventional d-dimer for pulmonary embolism.
        Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018; : 1
        • Righini M.
        • Van Es J.
        • Den Exter P.L.
        • Roy P.M.
        • Verschuren F.
        • Ghuysen A.
        • et al.
        Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
        Jama. 2014 Mar 19; 311: 1117-1124
        • Schouten H.J.
        • Geersing G.J.
        • Koek H.L.
        • Zuithoff N.P.
        • Janssen K.J.
        • Douma R.A.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Bmj. 2013 May 3; 346: f2492
        • van Es N.
        • van der Hulle T.
        • van Es J.
        • den Exter P.L.
        • Douma R.A.
        • Goekoop R.J.
        • et al.
        Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis.
        Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16; 165: 253-261
        • Gupta A.
        • Raja A.S.
        • Ip I.K.
        • Khorasani R.
        Assessing 2 D-dimer age-adjustment strategies to optimize computed tomographic use in ED evaluation of pulmonary embolism.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec 1; 32: 1499-1502
        • Crichlow A.
        • Cuker A.
        • Mills A.M.
        Overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Nov; 19: 1219-1226